History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Swearingen
2012 ND 6
| N.D. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Audrey Hollingsworth died in February 2006, survived by four sons: Lyle, Kevin, Jerry, and Cory.
  • Audrey's will devised land to Kevin and Cory, gave lifetime interests in the house to Jerry and Cory, and left the remainder in the four sons.
  • Informal probate began in 2006 with Lyle as the personal representative.
  • The house was insured under a Nodak policy listing Jerry as primary insured and Audrey as additional insured; the Estate was later listed as additional insured.
  • In May 2006 the house burned; Nodak paid insurance proceeds to Jerry and the Estate, prompting disputed allocations among the parties.
  • The district court ordered division of the proceeds and concluded debris-removal proceeds ($9,200) remained unresolved; it found Cory had not exercised his life estate.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is the judgment appealable without Rule 54(b) certification? Hollingsworth argues the judgment disposed of all issues between parties. The probate proceeding is unsupervised and requires Rule 54(b) certification for partial finality. Not appealable without Rule 54(b) certification.
Does finality require certification because not all disputes were resolved? Judgment finalizes distribution of insurance proceeds among parties. Incomplete resolution (including $9,200 debris-removal issue) means no final, appealable judgment without 54(b). Finality lacking; requires 54(b) certification or dismissal.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Walker, 2010 ND 214 (North Dakota 2010) (jurisdictional review of appealability)
  • Investors Title Ins. Co. v. Herzig, 2010 ND 138 (North Dakota 2010) (finality and Rule 54(b) applicability in probate)
  • Brummund v. Brummund, 2008 ND 224 (North Dakota 2008) (Rule 54(b) discretion in probate judgments)
  • Lund v. Lund, 2011 ND 53 (North Dakota 2011) (appeal from order for judgment treated as appeal from final judgment)
  • Gray v. North Dakota Game & Fish Dep’t, 2005 ND 204 (North Dakota 2005) (finality principles in state appellate review)
  • Matter of Estate of Sorensen, 406 N.W.2d 365 (North Dakota 1987) (Rule 54(b) considerations in probate appeals)
  • In re Estate of Stensland, 1998 ND 37 (North Dakota 1998) (unsupervised probate; need for 54(b) certification for partial finality)
  • In re Estate of Eggl, 2010 ND 104 (North Dakota 2010) (scope of appeal in probate proceedings)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Swearingen
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 12, 2012
Citation: 2012 ND 6
Docket Number: 20110227
Court Abbreviation: N.D.