History
  • No items yet
midpage
458 P.3d 220
Idaho Ct. App.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Jesse Ray Still was stopped for speeding and expired registration; he produced his license and other documents while officers ran his information.
  • Officer Clark called a drug-dog unit twice (initially from the roadside; a second ~10-second call from the patrol vehicle) before the dog arrived and alerted to the vehicle, leading to discovery of a firearm and methamphetamine.
  • Still moved to suppress the evidence, arguing the second radio call unlawfully prolonged the stop under Rodriguez v. United States and State v. Linze.
  • At the suppression hearing, Officer Clark testified the second call was due to portable radio problems; the district court found the call coincided with officers completing vehicle-entry and paperwork and denied the motion.
  • Still entered a conditional guilty plea to felon in possession, reserving the suppression issue, and appealed the denial of the motion to suppress.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a brief (~10s) radio call to request a drug-dog unit during a traffic stop unlawfully abandoned the stop’s mission and thus prolonged the seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment Still: The second radio call was unrelated to the traffic mission, added time, and therefore constituted unlawful abandonment under Rodriguez and Linze State: The call did not abandon or deviate from the traffic mission; it was a precursor to a possible investigation and did not itself prolong or convert the stop The court held the brief radio call did not constitute an abandonment of the traffic mission and did not unlawfully extend the stop; suppression denial affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015) (stops cannot be prolonged beyond mission absent reasonable suspicion; dog sniffs are unrelated to traffic mission)
  • Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005) (dog sniff during lawful stop is permissible if it does not prolong the stop)
  • State v. Linze, 161 Idaho 605, 389 P.3d 150 (2016) (applying Rodriguez; brief delay to assist a drug-dog sniff that abandoned the traffic mission violated the Fourth Amendment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Still
Court Name: Idaho Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 28, 2019
Citations: 458 P.3d 220; 166 Idaho 351; 45792
Docket Number: 45792
Court Abbreviation: Idaho Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Still, 458 P.3d 220