History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Staton
2011 Ohio 4889
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Staton indicted for theft from an elderly person (felony, fifth degree) in Defiance County.
  • Staton pled not guilty, then entered a guilty plea under a plea agreement offering either six months or twelve months with community control.
  • Pre-sentence, Staton moved to withdraw his guilty plea; the trial court denied the motion and sentenced him to twelve months prison.
  • Staton filed a direct appeal (november 2010) and later a post-sentence motion to withdraw the plea (December 2010); the appeal was voluntarily dismissed in January 2011.
  • The trial court conducted a hearing on the post-sentence motion (March 29, 2011) and denied the motion; Staton appeals again challenging both pre- and post-sentence denials.
  • The appellate court holds there was no abuse of discretion in either the pre-sentence denial or the post-sentence denial and affirms the judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Pre-sentence motion to withdraw plea standard Staton argues the court abused its discretion denying the pre-sentence motion. Staton contends there was a legitimate basis to withdraw before sentencing. Denied; no abuse of discretion; movant must show a basis, but none found.
Post-sentence motion to withdraw plea due to ineffective assistance Staton claims ineffective counsel supports manifest injustice warranting withdrawal. Staton asserts counsel failed to timely file the motion and mishandled defense. Denied; no manifest injustice; evidence insufficient to show ineffective assistance or prejudice.
Post-sentence motion to withdraw plea standard (manifest injustice) Staton seeks withdrawal as manifest injustice to correct prejudice. State opposes withdrawal for reasons of sentence and prejudice to victim. Denied; manifest injustice not shown; court acted within discretion.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Perry, 10 Ohio St.2d 175 (1967) (res judicata bars raising prior defenses after conviction on appeal)
  • State v. Xie, 62 Ohio St.3d 521 (1992) (pre-sentence motions to withdraw are to be freely and liberally granted but not absolute)
  • State v. Sylvester, 2008-Ohio-2901 (2008) (criteria for withdrawing plea include full hearing and fair consideration)
  • State v. Gibson, 2007-Ohio-6926 (2007) (manifest injustice standard governing post-sentence withdrawal)
  • State v. Stumpf, 32 Ohio St.3d 95 (1987) (reversal only for manifest injustice under Crim.R. 32.1)
  • State v. Perry, 10 Ohio St.2d 175 (1967) (res judicata may bar presenting defenses on appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Staton
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 26, 2011
Citation: 2011 Ohio 4889
Docket Number: 4-11-06
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.