History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Smith
2014 Ohio 5076
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Jeffrey M. Smith was indicted in Geauga County (Dec. 2010) on Passing Bad Checks, Theft (R.C. 2913.02(A)(3)), and Forgery; Passing Bad Checks was later dismissed.
  • Smith failed to appear for a pretrial hearing in March 2011; bond was revoked and a capias issued; he remained incarcerated on unrelated convictions in other counties for much of the time before pleading.
  • Smith filed an Inmate’s Notice of Place of Imprisonment (Feb. 6, 2013) while confined on other cases, and entered a written plea to fifth-degree felony Theft and Forgery (Oct. 28, 2013).
  • At sentencing (Jan. 13, 2014) the court imposed consecutive eight-month prison terms for Theft and Forgery and ordered restitution; Smith appealed.
  • On appeal Smith raised three issues: entitlement to pre-sentence jail-time credit, whether Theft and Forgery must merge, and whether H.B. 86’s reduction of certain theft grades applied to him.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Jail-time credit for period after bond revocation Trial court: credit given only for confinement "arising out of the offense" sentenced Smith: entitled to credit from filing of inmate notice (Feb. 6, 2013) while awaiting disposition Court: No credit; confinement was for unrelated convictions so R.C. 2967.191 inapplicable
Merger of Theft and Forgery (R.C. 2941.25) State: forgery (manufacturing spurious checks) and theft (using them to obtain funds) are distinct offenses Smith: theft required forgery; offenses are allied and should merge Court: offenses are not allied; separate acts (creation vs. obtaining money) support separate convictions
Application of H.B. 86 theft thresholds State: plea and plea colloquy show defendant understood he pleaded to felony theft (>= $1,000) Smith: he pled to indictment/bill of particulars alleging $500 theft, so felony classification changed by H.B. 86 should apply Court: Totality of circumstances show Smith knowingly pled to fifth-degree felony theft (>= $1,000); H.B. 86 did not invalidate plea

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153 (Ohio 2010) (test for allied offenses of similar import)
  • State v. Taylor, 138 Ohio St.3d 194 (Ohio 2014) (H.B. 86 theft-grade amendment applies when sentence not yet imposed)
  • State ex rel. Rankin v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 98 Ohio St.3d 476 (Ohio 2003) (trial court determines factual credit for jail time under R.C. 2967.191)
  • State v. Kalish, 120 Ohio St.3d 23 (Ohio 2008) (standard for appellate review of felony sentences)
  • State v. Underwood, 124 Ohio St.3d 365 (Ohio 2010) (plea agreements and allied-offenses obligation under R.C. 2941.25)
  • State v. Fitzpatrick, 102 Ohio St.3d 321 (Ohio 2004) (plea colloquy need not recite detailed elements if totality of circumstances show understanding)
  • State v. Smith, 71 Ohio App.3d 302 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991) (no jail-time credit for confinement arising from separate offenses)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Smith
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 17, 2014
Citation: 2014 Ohio 5076
Docket Number: 2014-G-3185
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.