History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Smith
2012 Ohio 967
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • July 10, 2011: Nathaniel Smith, Jr. assaults Bonnie Winchell, then forcibly enters her home after a verbal altercation.
  • Winchell’s two minor sons are present during the confrontation.
  • Smith grabs Winchell by her shirt, escorts her to a car, and drives to the Bottle Shop; Winchell did not willingly go.
  • Smith’s actions include breaking a door frame and threatening Winchell’s son; a 911 call is made.
  • Winchell’s glasses are damaged, and police observe the broken door frame and TV on the floor; Winchell gives statements to officers.
  • Smith is charged with abduction, assault, and menacing; he waives a jury trial and is convicted at bench trial and sentenced.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Speedy trial right violated State argues tolling applied due to a material witness warrant Smith contends delay violated speedy trial rights Issue waived on appeal; no reversal on this point
Confrontation rights and hearsay State argues Winchell statements fall within exceptions and admissible Smith asserts improper admission of hearsay Hearsay admitted as present sense/excited utterance; no reversal
Prosecutorial misconduct State contends alleged misconduct did not affect outcome Smith claims misconduct tainted trial Assignment rejected; no reversible error
Impartiality of trial judge State notes judge’s role as fact-finder and absence of bias Smith argues lack of impartiality due to prior involvement with MWR No error; judge impartial under circumstances
Weight of the evidence State argues ample proof of abduction and related conduct Smith challenges credibility of Winchell and recantations Conviction not against the manifest weight of the evidence

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Turner, 168 Ohio App.3d 176 (2006-Ohio-3786) (speedy-trial waiver/claim raised on appeal)
  • Worthington v. Ogilby, 8 Ohio App.3d 25 (1982-Ohio) (timeliness of speedy-trial-related claims)
  • State v. Rector, 2004-Ohio-4549 (2004-Ohio) (tolling of speedy-trial time)
  • State v. Vance, 2004-Ohio-258 (2004-Ohio) (speedy-trial tolling considerations)
  • State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (1987-Ohio) (thirteenth juror; weight of evidence)
  • State v. DeHass, 10 Ohio St.2d 230 (1967-Ohio) (credibility and weight of witness testimony)
  • State v. Britton, 2010-Ohio-2061 (5th Dist./Ohio) (present-sense/immediate-impulse statements exceptions)
  • Leonard, 104 Ohio St.3d 54 (2004-Ohio) (excitement-implied statements and reliability)
  • State v. Webb, 2010-Ohio-6122 (Ohio App.) (trial strategy and waiver of jury trial)
  • State v. Rippy, 2008-Ohio-6680 (Ohio App.) (jury-waiver strategy discussed)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984-S.Ct.) (ineffective-assistance standard)
  • Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365 (1986-S.Ct.) (merits of trial counsel performance)
  • State v. Santana, 739 N.E.2d 798 (2001-Ohio) (ineffective-assistance framework; prejudice)
  • State v. Lott, 51 Ohio St.3d 160 (1990-Ohio) (reasonable-strategy defense; hindsight not permitted)
  • State v. Leonard, ? (?) (see Leonard cited above as present context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Smith
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 28, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 967
Docket Number: 11-CA-66
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.