History
  • No items yet
midpage
268 P.3d 644
Or. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Officer Rico stopped a car matching a hit-and-run description that entered the Warm Springs Reservation.
  • Defendant crossed into the reservation, tires were deflated by tack strips, and he was detained inside the reservation by tribal officers.
  • Rico, with tribal officers, performed a high-risk stop, arrested defendant, and transported him to Jefferson County Jail after smelling alcohol and noting slurred speech.
  • Defendant’s blood-alcohol was .18% at the jail; charges included eluding, failing to perform duties of a driver, driving under the influence, and reckless driving.
  • Defendant moved to suppress arguing Rico lacked authority to stop/arrest on the reservation; trial court denied the motion.
  • Issue on appeal: whether nontribal police may arrest a tribal member on the Warm Springs Reservation during hot pursuit under WSTC 310.120.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether nontribal police may arrest on the Warm Springs Reservation during hot pursuit Rico had authority under WSTC 310.120 in hot pursuit. WSTC 310.120 does not authorize nontribal arrest on the reservation. Yes; nontribal officer may arrest on reservation under hot pursuit.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Caprar, 214 Or.App. 434 (2007) (standard for reviewing suppression rulings)
  • State v. Hall, 339 Or. 7 (2005) (arrest as a seizure under Article I, section 9)
  • State v. Gaines, 346 Or. 160 (2009) (statutory construction framework)
  • State v. Kurtz, 350 Or. 65 (2011) (Warm Springs tribal officer arrest authority on reservation boundary)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Smith
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Nov 23, 2011
Citations: 268 P.3d 644; 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 1598; 246 Or. App. 614; 07FE0142; A142178
Docket Number: 07FE0142; A142178
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Smith, 268 P.3d 644