History
  • No items yet
midpage
929 N.W.2d 35
Neb.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Jason P. Sinkey was charged with two counts of first-degree sexual assault of a child (victim Z.P., age 8) and one count of possession of a firearm by a prohibited person.
  • Victim testified Sinkey licked and rubbed her vaginal area on multiple occasions, showed his penis, asked her to touch it, and threatened her to keep silent.
  • Sinkey gave a post-arrest statement admitting he had licked the victim and asked her not to tell anyone.
  • Police executed search warrants on the crime scene and Sinkey’s residence and found a rifle, ammunition, and related items; records showed Sinkey had a prior felony conviction.
  • A jury convicted Sinkey on all counts; he received lengthy prison terms for the sexual assault convictions and a consecutive term for the firearm conviction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of evidence for sexual assault convictions State: Victim testimony and Sinkey’s admission establish sexual penetration and satisfy elements beyond a reasonable doubt Sinkey: Admission was not explicit enough and case relied mainly on victim’s statements, so evidence was insufficient Affirmed: Viewing evidence in State’s favor, victim testimony of licking/fingering sufficed to prove penetration and support convictions
Ineffective assistance of counsel Sinkey: Trial counsel inadequately cross-examined witnesses and failed to present favorable witnesses/evidence State: Claim is insufficiently particularized on the record to resolve on direct appeal; must be detailed to permit review and avoid procedural bar Affirmed: Court found allegations were conclusory and lacked specific instances of deficient performance; record inadequate to decide ineffectiveness on direct appeal

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Mrza, 302 Neb. 931, 926 N.W.2d 79 (Neb. 2019) (standards for reviewing ineffective-assistance claims on direct appeal and preservation principles)
  • State v. Filholm, 287 Neb. 763, 848 N.W.2d 571 (Neb. 2014) (ineffective-assistance claims on direct appeal may not always be resolvable from record)
  • State v. Abdullah, 289 Neb. 123, 853 N.W.2d 858 (Neb. 2014) (requirements for particularity in alleging ineffective assistance to avoid procedural bar)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Sinkey
Court Name: Nebraska Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 7, 2019
Citations: 929 N.W.2d 35; 303 Neb. 345; S-18-717
Docket Number: S-18-717
Court Abbreviation: Neb.
Log In
    State v. Sinkey, 929 N.W.2d 35