History
  • No items yet
midpage
43 A.3d 1146
N.J.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • This is a New Jersey Supreme Court decision addressing whether to depart from Pena-Flores on warrantless motor-vehicle searches.
  • The State asks to overturn Pena-Flores based on purported statewide effects and police data since Pena-Flores.
  • The record relies on state and amicus data but lacks a robust, statewide statistical record.
  • The Court declines to depart from Pena-Flores, signaling need for more representative data before reconsideration.
  • Authorities are urged to collect broader data on motor vehicle stops, searches, and related outcomes across diverse areas.
  • The petitions for certification are deemed improvidently granted and the appeals are dismissed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Pena-Flores should be departed from. Shannon, Deshazo, Crooms argue Pena-Flores is unsound or unworkable. State contends special justification exists to overturn Pena-Flores. No departure from Pena-Flores.
Whether the record supports special justification to depart from precedent. Record shows harms from Pena-Flores warrant reconsideration. Record is insufficient to justify departure. Insufficient justification; do not depart.
What data should be developed to reassess Pena-Flores in the future. Data from various jurisdictions and agencies are necessary. Representative data may be adequate; complete statewide data not required now. Encourages broader, representative data collection for potential future review.

Key Cases Cited

  • Luchejko v. City of Hoboken, 207 N.J. 191 (2011) (stare decisis supports flexible reconsideration when warranted)
  • Watson v. United States Rubber Co., 24 N.J. 598 (1957) (stare decisis with respect to certainty and stability)
  • Lokar v. Church of the Sacred Heart, 24 N.J. 549 (1957) (dissent cited re: flexibility of precedent)
  • In re Thompson, 53 N.J. 276 (1969) (judicial flexibility to revise or overrule for justice)
  • Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 504 U.S. 768 (1992) (considerations for departing from precedent; reliance interests)
  • State v. Pena-Flores, 198 N.J. 6 (2009) (established standard for warrantless searches of motor vehicles)
  • Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000) (flexibility of precedent and need for caution in departure)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Shannon
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 2, 2012
Citations: 43 A.3d 1146; 210 N.J. 225; A-117 September Term 2010, 067687, A-18 September Term 2011, 068220, A-21 September Term 2011, 068233, A-23 September Term 2011, 068248
Docket Number: A-117 September Term 2010, 067687, A-18 September Term 2011, 068220, A-21 September Term 2011, 068233, A-23 September Term 2011, 068248
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
Log In