History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Seymour
2013 Ohio 1936
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Indictment in July 2010 charged possession of crack cocaine under R.C. 2925.11(A) and possession of drug paraphernalia under R.C. 2925.14(C)(1) for an incident on May 14, 2010; alleged crack cocaine amount was 1–5 grams, making it a fourth-degree felony at the time.
  • June 2012 trial: jury found Seymour guilty of both offenses; sentencing later limited to penalties for fifth-degree felonies by HB 86 changes.
  • Defense raised two assignments of error: (1) sufficiency of the evidence to prove crack cocaine possession beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) manifest weight of the evidence.
  • Evidence included Officer Figula’s observation of Seymour discarding a baggie, field test positive for cocaine, and a lab report identifying cocaine base in a 1.89-gram rock; substance described as crack cocaine by form and base.
  • Court held sufficient evidence supported crack cocaine conviction, and credibility determinations supported weight-of-the-evidence defense; convictions affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the crack cocaine possession supported by sufficient evidence? Seymour Seymour contends evidence insufficient to prove crack cocaine Yes; sufficient evidence supported crack cocaine finding.
Are the verdicts against the manifest weight of the evidence? Seymour Seymour asserts weight favors acquittal due to credibility gaps No; cannot conclude trial court lost its way given credibility and surrounding testimony.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259 (Ohio 1991) (sufficiency standard for criminal convictions (par. syllabus))
  • State v. Williams, 2009-Ohio-6955 (9th Dist. 2009) (de novo sufficiency review)
  • State v. Banks, 182 Ohio Misc.3d 276, 2009-Ohio-1892 (Ohio 10th Dist. 2009) (distinguishing evidence for crack cocaine where Banks held insufficiency)
  • State v. Bielicki, 2012-Ohio-2124 (11th Dist. 2012) (reaffirming crack cocaine statutory interpretation under former R.C. 2925.01(GG)(X))
  • State v. Buck, 2006-Ohio-2174 (9th Dist. 2006) (ecessary form of cocaine for crack cocaine determination)
  • State v. Wilson, 2004-Ohio-144 (8th Dist. 2004) (cocaine in rock form sufficient to prove crack cocaine)
  • Otten, 33 Ohio App.3d 339 (9th Dist. 1986) (standard weight-of-the-evidence review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Seymour
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 13, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 1936
Docket Number: 12CA010250
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.