State v. Sergey Buslayev
299 P.3d 324
Mont.2013Background
- April 9, 2013 decision in MT 2013 MT 88; Montana Supreme Court.
- Buslayev appeals a jury verdict finding negligent homicide and criminal endangerment.
- December 17, 2008 collision on I-90 at McGee Point; victim Jerry Parrick died after Buslayev's tractor-trailer struck Parrick’s parked rescue pickup.
- Parties stipulated Parrick died as a result of injuries when struck by Buslayev’s truck; stipulation deemed proven.
- Buslayev moved to exclude five photos of the victim’s body; District Court admitted most photos after balancing probative value against prejudice.
- Court held the photos were probative to explain the accident and Buslayev’s speed, not unduly prejudicial, and admission did not constitute abuse of discretion.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Admissibility of victim photos under MRE 403 | Buslayev argues photos are prejudicial and non-probative given stipulation | State contends photos illustrate speed, impact, and circumstances; probative value outweighs prejudice | District Court did not abuse discretion; photos properly admitted |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Montgomery, 327 Mont. 138; 112 P.3d 1014 (2005 MT 120) (approval of probative value vs prejudice balancing for evidence)
- State v. Dunfee, 327 Mont. 335; 114 P.3d 217 (2005 MT 147) (photographs with instructional value admissible if not unduly prejudicial)
- State v. Henry, 241 Mont. 524; 788 P.2d 316 (1990) (probative value not outweighed by prejudice when relevant)
- State v. Heuther, 284 Mont. 259; 943 P.2d 1291 (1997) (standard for evaluating photographic evidence admissibility)
- State v. Bieber, 339 Mont. 309; 170 P.3d 444 (2007 MT 262) (probative value vs prejudice in photo evidence)
- State v. Schauf, 352 Mont. 186; 216 P.3d 740 (2009 MT 281) (photographic evidence admissibility considerations)
- State v. Devlin, 251 Mont. 278; 825 P.2d 185 (1991) (MRE 403 balancing framework for photos)
- State v. Austad, 197 Mont. 70; 641 P.2d 1373 (1982) (abuse-of-discretion standard in evidentiary rulings)
