779 S.E.2d 529
S.C.2015Background
- Cynthia Nelson was stabbed in the neck and later died after an altercation with Antonio Scott at a Ridgeland apartment; Scott fled but later surrendered.
- Scott told police he executed a martial-arts move that caused Cynthia to stab herself; no witness corroborated that account.
- At trial Scott did not testify and presented no evidence; the State introduced witness testimony contradicting the self-inflicted-stab story.
- The trial court instructed the jury on murder, voluntary manslaughter, and self-defense, but denied Scott’s requested involuntary manslaughter instruction.
- The jury convicted Scott of murder; Scott appealed arguing the court should have charged involuntary manslaughter.
- The South Carolina Supreme Court affirmed the court of appeals, holding the evidence did not support an involuntary manslaughter charge.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether evidence warranted an involuntary manslaughter jury instruction | Scott: his statement that he executed a martial-arts move supports a theory he unintentionally killed Cynthia and thus acted recklessly | State: evidence showed intentional conduct or justified self-defense; no evidence of reckless disregard required for involuntary manslaughter | Court: No—record lacked evidence of criminal negligence/recklessness; trial court did not err in refusing the instruction |
| Whether self-defense and involuntary manslaughter instructions can coexist here | Scott: jury could infer reckless excess in self-defense justifying involuntary manslaughter | State: self-defense instruction was given; imperfect self-defense is not adopted to convert to involuntary manslaughter | Court: Even if imperfect self-defense were recognized, it would at most support voluntary manslaughter; no basis for involuntary manslaughter here |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Sams, 410 S.C. 303 (discusses when lesser-included offense instructions are required and rejects imperfect self-defense as basis for involuntary manslaughter)
- State v. Smith, 315 S.C. 547 (trial court may refuse lesser-included instruction when no evidence supports it)
- State v. Laney, 367 S.C. 639 (standard of review: courts review legal errors; factual findings upheld absent abuse of discretion)
- State v. Pittman, 373 S.C. 527 (refusal to give a proper jury charge is an error of law)
- State v. Brayboy, 387 S.C. 174 (defines recklessness for criminal negligence)
- Robinson v. State, 308 S.C. 74 (self-defense is a complete defense to criminal charge)
