State v. Schwendeman
104 N.E.3d 44
Ohio Ct. App.2018Background
- Defendant Thomas Schwendeman was charged with and convicted by a jury of criminal damaging for dismantling a neighbor’s chain‑link fence; the trial court imposed suspended jail time, a fine, and restitution.
- Witnesses (neighbors and sheriff’s deputies) testified Schwendeman admitted kicking down the Roaches’ fence and acknowledged it was not his.
- Schwendeman testified he dismantled the fence because of repeated herbicide spraying, campfires, and alleged wear and tear, and claimed (contrary to earlier statements) that the fence was on his property.
- Defense counsel argued the damage was caused by wear and tear/others and did not request a jury instruction that a landowner has a privilege to remove an encroachment from his property.
- The trial court omitted any instruction on the owner’s privilege to remove encroachments; defendant did not object at trial and raised plain error and ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether omission of a jury instruction on a landowner’s privilege to remove encroachments was plain error/violated due process | State: no plain error because evidence did not support the affirmative defense | Schwendeman: failure to instruct deprived him of due process because privilege is a full defense | No error: defendant produced no credible evidence of ownership, so no instruction was warranted; omission not plain error |
| Whether trial counsel was ineffective for not requesting that instruction | State: counsel not ineffective for failing to request a meritless instruction | Schwendeman: counsel deficient for not requesting instruction on affirmative defense | Not ineffective: requesting the instruction would have been meritless and counsel pursued alternate trial strategy |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Williford, 49 Ohio St.3d 247 (Ohio 1990) (jury‑instruction principles cited)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (standard for ineffective assistance of counsel)
- State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136 (Ohio 1989) (ineffective‑assistance framework)
- State v. Melchior, 56 Ohio St.2d 15 (Ohio 1978) (standard for raising affirmative defenses)
- State v. Cooper, 170 Ohio App.3d 418 (Ohio Ct. App.) (plain‑error waiver for failure to object to jury instructions)
