History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Schwendeman
104 N.E.3d 44
Ohio Ct. App.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Thomas Schwendeman was charged with and convicted by a jury of criminal damaging for dismantling a neighbor’s chain‑link fence; the trial court imposed suspended jail time, a fine, and restitution.
  • Witnesses (neighbors and sheriff’s deputies) testified Schwendeman admitted kicking down the Roaches’ fence and acknowledged it was not his.
  • Schwendeman testified he dismantled the fence because of repeated herbicide spraying, campfires, and alleged wear and tear, and claimed (contrary to earlier statements) that the fence was on his property.
  • Defense counsel argued the damage was caused by wear and tear/others and did not request a jury instruction that a landowner has a privilege to remove an encroachment from his property.
  • The trial court omitted any instruction on the owner’s privilege to remove encroachments; defendant did not object at trial and raised plain error and ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether omission of a jury instruction on a landowner’s privilege to remove encroachments was plain error/violated due process State: no plain error because evidence did not support the affirmative defense Schwendeman: failure to instruct deprived him of due process because privilege is a full defense No error: defendant produced no credible evidence of ownership, so no instruction was warranted; omission not plain error
Whether trial counsel was ineffective for not requesting that instruction State: counsel not ineffective for failing to request a meritless instruction Schwendeman: counsel deficient for not requesting instruction on affirmative defense Not ineffective: requesting the instruction would have been meritless and counsel pursued alternate trial strategy

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Williford, 49 Ohio St.3d 247 (Ohio 1990) (jury‑instruction principles cited)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (standard for ineffective assistance of counsel)
  • State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136 (Ohio 1989) (ineffective‑assistance framework)
  • State v. Melchior, 56 Ohio St.2d 15 (Ohio 1978) (standard for raising affirmative defenses)
  • State v. Cooper, 170 Ohio App.3d 418 (Ohio Ct. App.) (plain‑error waiver for failure to object to jury instructions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Schwendeman
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 17, 2018
Citation: 104 N.E.3d 44
Docket Number: 17CA7
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.