History
  • No items yet
midpage
265 P.3d 36
Or. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Apartment complex management issued defendant a written notice of exclusion prohibiting entry or remaining in common areas, warning of criminal trespass penalties.
  • Months later, Flynn, a tenant, invited defendant to visit; defendant was found in the parking lot cleaning Flynn's car when approached by a police officer.
  • Defendant was charged with second-degree criminal trespass (ORS 164.245) and a bench trial followed.
  • Defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal after the State rested, arguing the State failed to prove he was not licensed or privileged to be in the common area.
  • Trial court denied the motion and found defendant guilty; on appeal, question was whether Flynn’s invitation was superseded by the manager’s exclusion.
  • Court applied common-law trespass principles, holding a tenant generally may invite guests to common areas unless lease terms limit that authority.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did Flynn lack authority to invite defendant to the common area, such that defendant was not privileged to be there? State: Flynn lacked authority after exclusion; guest not privileged. Schneider: Flynn had authority to invite; exclusion did not bar his guest. No; Flynn had authority to invite, making defendant privileged.
Did defendant's knowledge of Flynn's lack of authority affect the outcome? State: defendant knew there was no authority to invite. Schneider: reliance on Flynn's invitation was privilege; knowledge not shown. Not necessary to prove lack of authority; privilege existed via Flynn's invitation.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Hartfield, 290 Or. 583, 624 P.2d 588 (Or. 1981) (two-element test for non-privilege under invitation)
  • State v. Hall, 181 Or. App. 536, 47 P.3d 55 (Or. App. 2002) (foundation for trespass beyond common understanding)
  • Arbee v. Collins, 219 Ga. App. 63, 463 S.E.2d 922 (Ga. App. 1995) (guest privileges on common areas generally with tenant's rights)
  • L.D.L. v. State, 569 So.2d 1310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990) (no-trespass notices and invitees context in housing)
  • Dixon, 169 Vt. 15, 725 A.2d 920 (Vt. 1999) (landlord cannot block tenant invitees from common areas)
  • Widell, 146 Wash. 2d 561, 51 P.3d 733 (Wash. 2002) (lease terms may limit tenant's invitation rights)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Schneider
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Oct 19, 2011
Citations: 265 P.3d 36; 246 Or. App. 163; 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 1449; D093299M; A143746
Docket Number: D093299M; A143746
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Schneider, 265 P.3d 36