History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Schmick
2013 Ohio 4488
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Schmick became a suspect in internet crimes against children; July 2009 computer seizure occurred.
  • December 2009 Schmick was charged with over 80 offenses; April 2010 he pled guilty to several counts.
  • A prior presentence report was prepared; he was sentenced to 17 years, designated Tier II, with 5 years postrelease control, a plea reversal occurred on appeal.
  • On remand, Schmick accepted a new plea to 45 counts; remaining counts were nolled; a new presentence report was prepared.
  • Trial court sentenced Schmick to 16 years with consecutive terms; Schmick now appeals raising three assignments of error.
  • This court reverses and remands for resentencing, directing allied-offense inquiry and reconsideration of proportionality.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Consecutive-sentence findings adequate Schmick Schmick Findings not satisfactorily tied to statutory requirements; error in imposition
Proportionality compared to similar offenders Proportionality supported by precedent Sentence excessive relative to similar cases Second assignment sustained to the extent discussed; remand for proportionality reconsideration
Merger/allied offenses of pandering and illegal use Allied offenses should be considered under Johnson framework Issues were not properly developed at trial Plain error to fail to conduct allied-offense inquiry; merger analysis required on remand

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153 (2010-Ohio-6314) (overruled prior Rance approach; analyze conduct for allied-offense merge)
  • State v. Venes, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 98682, 2013-Ohio-1891 (2013-Ohio-1891) (requires clear allied-offense inquiry; plain-error standard)
  • State v. Rogers, 2013-Ohio-3235 (8th Dist. Cuyahoga) (en banc discussion on allied offenses and merger procedures)
  • State v. Phillips, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 92560, 2009-Ohio-5564 (2009-Ohio-5564) (consideration of seriousness and recidivism factors in proportionality)
  • State v. Corrao, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 95167, 2011-Ohio-2517 (2011-Ohio-2517) (allied offenses analysis in context of merger)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Schmick
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 10, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 4488
Docket Number: 99262
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.