History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Sandoval
150 N.M. 224
| N.M. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Sandoval was convicted of second-degree murder for the shooting of McCormick during a multi-person confrontation.
  • McCormick was in the back seat of the Explorer with Arbizu and Ramos; Arbizu and Ramos confronted Sandoval at a gas station.
  • Arbizu and Ramos exited the Explorer with guns; Sandoval exited Girlfriend's car with a gun and shots were fired.
  • McCormick’s exact role is unclear; some witnesses indicated he was pursuing something in the Explorer while others did not.
  • Two self-defense and two defense of another jury instructions were given, but McCormick was omitted from the multi-assailant analysis.
  • The Court of Appeals reversed, concluding the instructions were fundamental error; the NM Supreme Court reversed that ruling and held no fundamental error.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether self-defense and defense of another instructions were proper Sandoval argues multiple assailants required these instructions. Sandoval contends the instructions failed to reflect his theory of defense. Instructions proper to reflect multiple assailants.
Whether omission of McCormick as an assailant caused fundamental error McCormick’s role as an assailant must be included to avoid misstatement of law. McCormick could be viewed as either assailant or bystander; omission not fundamental error. No fundamental error; conviction not miscarried.

Key Cases Cited

  • Coffin, 128 N.M. 192, 991 P.2d 477 (1999-NMSC-038) (multi-assailant self-defense instruction cautions against misstatement)
  • Cooper, 128 N.M. 428, 993 P.2d 745 (1999-NMCA-159) (multiple assailants; self-defense may include threats from all attackers)
  • Rudolfo, 144 N.M. 305, 187 P.3d 170 (2008-NMSC-036) (elements of self-defense; justification for instruction when reasonable doubt exists)
  • Barber, 135 N.M. 621, 92 P.3d 633 (2004-NMSC-019) (fundamental error review; miscarriage of justice standard)
  • Benally, 131 N.M. 258, 34 P.3d 1134 (2001-NMSC-033) (preservation and standard of review for jury instructions)
  • Ellis, 144 N.M. 253, 186 P.3d 245 (2008-NMSC-032) (review evidence in light of self-defense instruction)
  • Gallegos, 130 N.M. 221, 22 P.3d 689 (2001-NMCA-021) (defense of another; relation to multiple assailants)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Sandoval
Court Name: New Mexico Supreme Court
Date Published: May 13, 2011
Citation: 150 N.M. 224
Docket Number: 32,149
Court Abbreviation: N.M.