History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Sanders
208 N.C. App. 142
N.C. Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • On December 10, 2008, Norman invited Sanders and Gillikin to join a planned fight with Salter over Gibbs' affections.
  • They drove to Lester's home, were told to leave, then returned toward Buffaloes' residence with beers and aggressive conduct.
  • At the Buffaloes' home, defendant's father punched Justin Buffaloe; defendant's group joined the altercation after a challenge to a war.
  • Defendant retrieved a wooden dowel and struck Mark Buffaloe, causing serious injuries including a fractured skull and brain hemorrhage.
  • Indictments charged one count of assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury and one count of felony conspiracy to commit such assault.
  • The jury was instructed on conspiracy as an implied agreement; verdicts found defendant guilty of the lesser assault and conspiracy charges; sentence 24–38 months.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was there substantial evidence of a conspiracy to assault Buffaloe? Sanders argues no meeting of the minds to assault Buffaloe. State contends implied agreement existed from conduct and imminent joiners. Yes; substantial evidence supported conspiracy.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Gell, 351 N.C. 192 (2000) (conspiracy elements; implied agreement allowed)
  • State v. Lawrence, 352 N.C. 1 (2000) (mutual, implied understanding suffices)
  • State v. Whiteside, 204 N.C. 710 (1933) (conspiracy can be proved by indirect evidence)
  • State v. Christopher, 307 N.C. 645 (1983) (meeting of the minds requirement)
  • State v. Larrimore, 340 N.C. 119 (1995) (jury question for conspiracy existence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Sanders
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 16, 2010
Citation: 208 N.C. App. 142
Docket Number: COA10-233
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.