State v. Sales
2011 Ohio 2505
Ohio Ct. App.2011Background
- Sales attacked Lt. Edwards at Portage Path Psychiatric Emergency Services, knocking him unconscious and choking him while reaching for the gun.
- Sales was indicted on aggravated robbery, attempted murder, felonious assault, and aggravated menacing, each with a repeat violent offender specification.
- The jury convicted Sales of aggravated robbery, attempted murder, and felonious assault; he was acquitted of aggravated menacing.
- Sales was sentenced to an aggregate term of 22 years in prison.
- Sales appealed challenging manifest-weight and evidentiary rulings from the trial court.
- The court affirmed the convictions and rejected both assignments of error.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Admissibility of taped witness statements for impeachment | Sales sought admission of police interview tapes for impeachment | Court should admit tapes as extrinsic impeachment evidence under Evid.R. 613(B) | Court did not abuse discretion; tapes not admitted for impeachment evidence |
| Convictions against manifest weight of the evidence | Weight of the evidence supports reversal | Evidence supports the jury’s verdict | Convictions not against the manifest weight; evidence supported each verdict |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Otten, 33 Ohio App.3d 339 (Ohio App.3d 1986) (weight-of-the-evidence standard; thirteenth juror concept)
- State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (Ohio 1997) (weight and credibility review; discretionary new trial)
- State v. Martin, 20 Ohio App.3d 172 (Ohio App.3d 1983) (exceptional-case standard for reversing weight of the evidence)
- State v. Redwine, No. CA2006-08-011, 2007-Ohio-6413 (Ohio 12th Dist.) (loss of consciousness can establish serious physical harm)
- State v. Lee, No. L-06-1384, 2008-Ohio-253 (Ohio 6th Dist.) (serious physical harm can be inferred where victim seeks medical treatment)
- State v. Mulvey, No. 07 BE 31, 2009-Ohio-6756 (Ohio 7th Dist.) (extrinsic-impeachment rules when witness admits making prior statements)
