History
  • No items yet
midpage
221 N.C. App. 572
N.C. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Rollins was convicted by jury of non-felonious breaking or entering, first degree kidnapping, second degree rape, and resisting a public officer after July 2008 events involving M.S.
  • M.S. testified about rape and threats during a July 2008 encounter at her home; deputies responded and took Rollins into custody.
  • Trial court sentenced Rollins to concurrent terms totaling significant years and arrested judgment on one kidnapping conviction, then noted an appeal.
  • Rollins challenged: (1) Sixth Amendment public-trial right violated by courtroom closure during M.S.’s testimony and (2) whether a Florida burglary conviction was sufficiently similar to North Carolina burglary for prior record level calculations.
  • Court remanded for a new hearing on the closure issue under the four-part Waller test and reversed/remanded for a new sentencing hearing due to misclassification of prior offenses.
  • The opinion discusses procedures for preserving public-trial objections and analyzes out-of-state offense similarity for sentencing purposes.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Public trial closure under Waller test State argued to close under § 15-166 for rape testimony Rollins contends closure violated public-trial rights Remanded to apply Waller four-part test on closure
Adequacy of Waller findings State sought closure without explicit findings Rollins contends lack of findings invalidates closure Remanded to require explicit Waller findings or new trial if closure improper
Prior record level evaluation State used Florida burglary as similar to NC burglary for four points Rollins argues Florida burglary not sufficiently similar Florida burglary not sufficiently similar; remand for new sentencing hearing to re-evaluate prior record level with proper similarity analysis

Key Cases Cited

  • Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (U.S. 1984) (public-trial right; four-part test for closure)
  • Bell v. Evatt, 72 F.3d 421 (4th Cir. 1995) (open-trial presumption; adequacy of findings reviewed with record)
  • State v. Jenkins, 115 N.C. App. 520 (N.C. App. 1994) (require findings to support closure; remand guidance in Waller context)
  • State v. Smith, 180 N.C. App. 86 (N.C. App. 2006) (recognizes Waller applicability to § 15-166 closures)
  • Minnesota v. McRae, 494 N.W.2d 252 (Minn. 1992) (yet supports need for record demonstrating necessity of closure)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Rollins
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Jul 17, 2012
Citations: 221 N.C. App. 572; 729 S.E.2d 73; 2012 WL 2890770; 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 870; No. COA11-1437
Docket Number: No. COA11-1437
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Rollins, 221 N.C. App. 572