History
  • No items yet
midpage
2014 Ohio 5435
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Paul Robinson was charged with attempted murder, felonious assault, kidnapping, and domestic violence in Crim.R. trial begun in 2006.
  • Robinson pled no contest to all charges after initially signaling a desire to proceed to trial; the court conducted a Crim.R. 11 colloquy and accepted the plea.
  • At sentencing, the victim testified, and the court sentenced Robinson to a total 15-year term.
  • Robinson moved to withdraw his plea in November 2006; the trial court denied despite his later request to go to trial.
  • Robinson pursued direct appeal challenging the plea, competency, and related issues; the appeal affirmed the trial court’s judgment in 2007.
  • In 2014, Robinson moved for resentencing on multiple punishments arguing allied offenses should have merged; the trial court denied.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the 15-year sentence violated be law Robinson contends the sentence was unlawful. Robinson argues merger issues and improper sentencing. Appellant’s sentence affirmed; arguments rejected.
Whether allied offenses should have merged and whether plea was knowing Robinson asserts allied-offense merger and that plea was not knowingly made. Robinson contends merger and flawed plea procedure. Merger issue barred by res judicata; plea validity upheld.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Saxon, 109 Ohio St.3d 176, 846 N.E.2d 824 (Ohio 2006) (res judicata bars issues that could have been raised on direct appeal)
  • State v. Williams, State v. Williams, 2014-Ohio-1239 (Ohio 2014) (allied-offense merger issues must be raised on direct appeal)
  • State v. Allen, State v. Allen, 2012-Ohio-3364 (Ohio 2012) (merger issues barred by res judicata)
  • State v. Poole, State v. Poole, 2011-Ohio-716 (Ohio 2011) (allied offenses merger doctrine)
  • State v. Flagg, State v. Flagg, 2011-Ohio-5386 (Ohio 2011) (allied offenses and merger considerations)
  • State v. Davis, State v. Davis, 2014-Ohio-3591 (Ohio 2014) (direct-appeal bar on merger issues)
  • State v. Nicholson, State v. Nicholson, 2014-Ohio-607 (Ohio 2014) (merger and res judicata principles in appellate review)
  • State v. Hough, State v. Hough, 2013-Ohio-1543 (Ohio 2013) (direct-appeal focus on merger and sentencing issues)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Robinson
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 11, 2014
Citations: 2014 Ohio 5435; 101426
Docket Number: 101426
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Robinson, 2014 Ohio 5435