State v. Robeson
25 Neb. Ct. App. 138
| Neb. Ct. App. | 2017Background
- Robeson, a 34–35-year-old former teacher, pled guilty to one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child (Class II felony) as part of a plea deal that dismissed a second count and jointly recommended a 40-to-40-year sentence.
- The charged sexual acts occurred on multiple occasions between Sept. 1, 2014 and Dec. 27, 2015; Robeson admitted the relationship and sexual intercourse with a 13–14-year-old student.
- At plea hearing counsel requested expedited sentencing and stated Robeson would waive a presentence investigation (PSI); the court continued sentencing and acknowledged the waiver via counsel’s representation.
- At sentencing Robeson and counsel sought leniency; the court declined to consider less than the agreed 40-to-40 recommendation and Robeson affirmed he did not wish to withdraw his plea.
- The district court imposed the agreed 40-to-40-year sentence. On appeal Robeson challenged (1) sentencing without a PSI/valid waiver, (2) excessiveness of the sentence, (3) imposition of identical minimum and maximum terms, and (4) ineffective assistance of trial counsel (advice to accept plea and failure to request a PSI).
Issues
| Issue | Robeson’s Argument | State’s Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valid waiver of presentence investigation | Waiver was not knowing/voluntary; court failed to personally advise or confirm Robeson’s understanding | Waiver was valid; counsel expressly waived PSI and Robeson did not object; expedited plea context justified waiver | Waiver valid under totality of circumstances; no clear error in accepting waiver |
| Excessive sentence | Court failed to seriously consider mitigating factors; sentence excessive | Sentence within statutory range; court considered factors and parties jointly recommended sentence | No abuse of discretion; sentence not excessive |
| Identical minimum and maximum terms (40–40) under §29‑2204 | Violates §29‑2204 and denies realistic parole opportunity | §29‑2204 changes don’t apply because offense had elements before Aug 30, 2015; 40–40 valid under prior law | 40–40 valid: statute inapplicable here; identical min/max is an indeterminate sentence in Nebraska |
| Ineffective assistance — advice to accept plea | Counsel rendered deficient advice by urging acceptance of unwarranted lengthy sentence | Plea was knowing/voluntary; plea reduced exposure (two IB felonies to one II); no prejudice from counsel’s advice | Claim without merit: record shows plea was voluntary and beneficial to Robeson |
| Ineffective assistance — failure to request PSI | Counsel erred by not seeking PSI prior to sentencing | Record shows waiver of PSI; conversations off-record so appellate record insufficient to adjudicate | Record insufficient on direct appeal to resolve this claim; not decided on merits |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Qualls, 284 Neb. 929, 824 N.W.2d 362 (Neb. 2012) (discusses waiver of PSI and adequacy of court advisories)
- State v. Kellogg, 10 Neb. App. 557, 633 N.W.2d 916 (Neb. Ct. App. 2001) (failure to advise of PSI or record waiver required vacatur)
- State v. Tolbert, 223 Neb. 794, 394 N.W.2d 288 (Neb. 1986) (PSI may be waived)
- Sedlacek v. State, 147 Neb. 834, 25 N.W.2d 533 (Neb. 1946) (waiver may be inferred from silent acquiescence to counsel’s actions)
- State v. Sayers, 211 Neb. 555, 319 N.W.2d 438 (Neb. 1982) (defendant present and silent while counsel acts may imply waiver)
- State v. Artis, 296 Neb. 606, 894 N.W.2d 349 (Neb. 2017) (same min and max terms do not convert an indeterminate sentence into a determinate one)
- State v. Collins, 292 Neb. 602, 873 N.W.2d 657 (Neb. 2016) (appellate standard for reviewing alleged excessive sentence)
- State v. Casares, 291 Neb. 150, 864 N.W.2d 667 (Neb. 2015) (preservation and review standards for ineffective assistance claims on direct appeal)
- State v. Burries, 297 Neb. 367, 900 N.W.2d 483 (Neb. 2017) (when ineffective-assistance claims can be resolved on direct appeal)
- State v. Filholm, 287 Neb. 763, 848 N.W.2d 571 (Neb. 2014) (ineffective assistance: review when record conclusively shows lack of prejudice)
- State v. Ortega, 290 Neb. 172, 859 N.W.2d 305 (Neb. 2015) (Strickland standard restated)
