History
  • No items yet
midpage
291 P.3d 777
Or. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Milwaukee-area officers respond to anonymous 9-1-1 screams and decide to enter the apartment to check for occupants in distress.
  • Officers obtain a key, force entry after a security chain prevents full opening, and locate victim and defendant in the bedroom.
  • Defendant and victim later give inculpatory statements; defendant is charged with coercion, two counts of fourth-degree assault, and menacing.
  • Defendant moves to suppress statements, arguing unlawful warrantless entry; trial court rejects, applying the emergency aid exception.
  • During trial, venue is at issue for certain assaults; the court and prosecutor misstate which incidents had venue.
  • The court denies acquittal on some counts and later reverses one assault conviction due to insufficiency of ‘physical injury’ evidence for kicking.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether emergency aid justified warrantless entry Emergency aid justified entry given screams and prior problems. Entry was unlawful without a warrant. Entry was justified under emergency aid exception.
Whether venue was established for all assaults Venue existed for kicking and slapping incidents. Venue not established for one incident (slapping) due to misstatement. Error not preserved; affirm; no plain error corrected.
Whether substantial pain or impairment suffices for fourth-degree assault kicking Bruising and pain evidenced substantial physical injury. No substantial pain or impairment shown from kicking. Kicking assault reversed for lack of substantial pain/impairment.
Whether remaining assault and other charges support convictions Evidence supports multiple assaults and other offenses. Various charges lack sufficient proof. One assault conviction reversed; others affirmed; contempt convictions upheld.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Baker, 350 Or 641 (2011) (emergency aid exception—need objectively reasonable belief of imminent aid)
  • State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66 (1993) (review standard for suppression rulings)
  • State v. Poole, 175 Or App 258 (2001) (definition of physical injury; substantial pain concept)
  • State v. Wright, 253 Or App 401 (2012) (bruising without impairment may be insufficient for physical impairment)
  • State v. Anderson, 221 Or App 193 (2008) (substantial pain required for substantial impairment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Rennells
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Nov 21, 2012
Citations: 291 P.3d 777; 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1346; 253 Or. App. 580; CR0900882, CR0912875; A144017, A144018
Docket Number: CR0900882, CR0912875; A144017, A144018
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Rennells, 291 P.3d 777