History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Ramirez-Herrara
306 Ga. App. 878
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Ramirez-Herrara was charged with five counts of violating the Georgia Street Gang Terrorism and Prevention Act and additional gun and false information offenses.
  • The trial court granted a general demurrer to the Anti-Gang Act counts, effectively dismissing those twelve counts, which the State appealed.
  • The State contends the indictment sufficiently states the offense under the Anti-Gang Act and that the court erred in granting the demurrer.
  • The issue centers on whether the demurrer was improper because the indictment tracked the statutory language and stated a criminal gang activity theory.
  • The trial court later based its demurrer on alleged lack of nexus/evidence, but the court held the demurrer should be judged on pleading sufficiency, not evidence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the demurrer as to Anti-Gang Act counts was properly appealable Ramirez-Herrara contends the demurrer dismissal is appealable. Ramirez-Herrara argues lack of proper appellate basis for the State's challenge. Yes; the order dismissing counts is directly appealable.
Whether the indictment sufficiently states Anti-Gang Act offenses under OCGA 17-7-54(a) Counts 6-10 track the statute and are understandable to a jury. Counts fail to show nexus or essential elements beyond bare statute language. Indictments are sufficient; demurrer reversed.
Whether the trial court erred by relying on evidence proffered to grant demurrer Demurrer focuses on pleading sufficiency, not proven facts. Proffered evidence is necessary to assess nexus. Yes; the court erred to consider evidence; demurrer is improper.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Corhen, 306 Ga.App. 495 (Ga. App. 2010) (pleading sufficiency and demurrer standards for indictment challenges)
  • State v. Yapo, 296 Ga. App. 158 (Ga. App. 2009) (direct appeal from dismissal of counts under OCGA 5-7-1(a)(1))
  • Rodriguez v. State, 284 Ga. 803 (Ga. 2009) (nexus requirement for certain gang activity statutes)
  • Falagian v. State, 300 Ga. App. 187 (Ga. App. 2009) (demurrer standards and indictment sufficiency)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Ramirez-Herrara
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 19, 2010
Citation: 306 Ga. App. 878
Docket Number: A10A0982
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.