History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Purdin
2012 Ohio 752
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Purdin shot and killed his stepson during an altercation on Dec. 5, 2010.
  • He was indicted on three counts: murder (Count I), felony murder (Count II), reckless homicide (Count III).
  • The jury convicted on Counts II and III and deadlocked on Count I, which the court mistried.
  • The court later sentenced on Counts II and III with an additional restitution order; Count I remained pending.
  • The appellate court dismissed the appeal for lack of a final appealable order since Count I was neither dismissed nor retried.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court’s judgment is a final appealable order Purdin (State) argues finality is lacking due to Count I pending Purdin contends there is a final order because Count I remained unresolved No final appealable order; Count I pending; appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Effect of the mistrial on Count I Mistrial on Count I ended the charge Mistrial did not dispose of Count I; remaining proceedings pending Mistrial alone does not finalize Count I; jurisdictional issue remains
Whether Count I was ever dismissed or retried Count I was not dismissed or retried Count I remains unresolved Count I not dismissed/retried; no final order; appeal jurisdiction lacking
Court’s jurisdiction to review given pending Count I Appellate review appropriate despite unresolved Count I Lack of final order deprives appellate jurisdiction Court lacks jurisdiction; appeal dismissed

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Rothe, 2009-Ohio-1852 (Ohio Ct. App.) (hangs on unresolved count; finality needed for appeal)
  • State v. Robinson, 2008-Ohio-5885 (Ohio Ct. App.) (unresolved charge prevents final appealable order)
  • Eddie v. Saunders, 2008-Ohio-4755 (Ohio Ct. App.) (jurisdictional rule on finality applies to criminal appeals)
  • State v. Baker, 119 Ohio St.3d 197 (Ohio Supreme Court) (finality requirement in criminal appeals; assesses when appeal lies)
  • State v. Coffman, 2007-Ohio-3765 (Ohio Ct. App.) (discussion of finality when charges remain pending)
  • State v. Darget, 2010-Ohio-3541 (Ohio Ct. App.) (court lacks jurisdiction if not all charges disposed)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Purdin
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 23, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 752
Docket Number: 11CA909
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.