History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Primm
347 S.W.3d 66
| Mo. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Daniel M. Primm was convicted on ten counts of sexual abuse involving his grandniece, T.B., and testified by R.C. as well.
  • Multiple uncharged acts against T.B. and R.C. were admitted to show motive and a coherent sequence of events.
  • T.B. was 14 and R.C. was 15 at the times of the alleged offenses.
  • Acts occurred in St. Louis City, St. Louis County, including a fruit company parking lot, T.B.’s home, a dining area, and a hotel.
  • Primm was convicted of several counts and sentenced to a total of 20 years; judgment was corrected by nunc pro tunc remand.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Admissibility of uncharged crimes evidence against the victims State: admissible to show motive/complete picture Primm: abuse of discretion; prejudicial Admissible under proper exceptions and for complete picture
Sufficiency of evidence for Count I (second-degree statutory rape in moving truck) State: evidence shows penetration implied by testimony Primm: no explicit proof of vaginal penetration Sufficient evidence of sexual intercourse supporting Count I
Judgment vs. oral pronouncement; clerical correction needed Written judgment inconsistent with oral ruling Correction permissible; nunc pro tunc appropriate Remanded to correct written judgment nunc pro tunc

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Vorhees, 248 S.W.3d 585 (Mo. banc 2008) (establishes limits on admissibility for other crimes evidence)
  • State v. Ellison, 239 S.W.3d 603 (Mo. banc 2007) (exclusionary rule for other crimes; exceptions apply)
  • State v. Thurman, 272 S.W.3d 489 (Mo.App. 2008) (complete and coherent picture of events; same child testimony)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Primm
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Aug 30, 2011
Citation: 347 S.W.3d 66
Docket Number: SC 91427
Court Abbreviation: Mo.