State v. Pope
305 Neb. 912
| Neb. | 2020Background
- Three related shootings in Omaha (Aug. 5, 6, and 8, 2015): an attempted shooting of Garion Johnson (Aug. 5), arson and the murder of Deprecia Neelon (Aug. 6), and the murder of Johnson (Aug. 8).
- Physical evidence linked Pope: his partial palmprint on a .357 revolver found in Marcus Short’s bedroom (ballistics tied that revolver to Johnson’s wounds); two .45 casings from Neelon’s scene matched a .45 recovered from Short’s bedroom; DNA from a buccal swab of Pope was a major contributor to a black hooded sweatshirt and pants seized at Short’s home; a minivan registered to Pope’s mother matched a vehicle seen leaving Neelon’s scene; cell records placed Pope nearby during the incidents.
- Eyewitness Marcella observed the Aug. 5 shooter briefly (about 3 seconds), later saw Pope at the courthouse after a TV news segment that used the same photo included in the later police photo lineup; she identified Pope in the lineup and at trial.
- Pretrial rulings: the district court found the affidavit for a DNA warrant lacked probable cause but admitted the DNA under the good-faith exception; the court denied suppression of Marcella’s identification (no evidence of suggestive police conduct).
- Pope was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder, two counts of use of a deadly weapon during a felony, and one count possession of a deadly weapon by a prohibited person; he appealed and the Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Felony-murder instruction (Neelon) | State: jury instruction on felony murder and arson elements was proper. | Pope: court should have instructed proximate-cause/efficient-intervening-cause (fire must be proximate cause of death). | Court: No proximate-cause instruction required—death undisputedly from gunshots and closely connected to arson; given instructions sufficient. |
| Aiding-and-abetting instruction | State: standard NJI instruction correctly stated law. | Pope: requested language clarifying mere presence/acquiescence insufficient and requiring some participation should be included. | Court: NJI instructions plus language on mere presence were functionally equivalent; refusal to give Pope’s wording not prejudicial. |
| DNA warrant / suppression | State: DNA admissible under good-faith exception despite affidavit defects. | Pope: affidavit lacked probable cause; DNA should be suppressed. | Court: District court found lack of probable cause but applied good-faith exception; on appeal Pope waived error by failing to object to DNA expert testimony at trial—claim not preserved. |
| Photographic lineup / eyewitness ID (Marcella) | State: lineup not unduly suggestive; no police misconduct; reliability for jury to assess. | Pope: photo shown on TV made the lineup suggestive and the ID unreliable (short observation, time lapse). | Court: No evidence of police-arranged suggestiveness; preliminary reliability inquiry not required; jury could evaluate reliability—admission upheld. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Harris, 194 Neb. 74, 230 N.W.2d 203 (1975) (proximate-cause instruction appropriate when evidence raises disputed intervening-cause issue)
- State v. Quintana, 261 Neb. 38, 621 N.W.2d 121 (2001) (no proximate-cause instruction required where cause of death not disputed; focus is whether death occurred in course of felony)
- State v. Stubbendieck, 302 Neb. 702, 924 N.W.2d 711 (2019) (statement of aiding-and-abetting elements and participation requirement)
- State v. Nolan, 283 Neb. 50, 807 N.W.2d 520 (2012) (Due Process does not require preliminary reliability hearing absent suggestive law-enforcement conduct)
- Perry v. New Hampshire, 565 U.S. 228 (2012) (Supreme Court: no judicial reliability inquiry required where identification not procured by police suggestion)
- State v. Molina, 271 Neb. 488, 713 N.W.2d 412 (2006) (preservation rule for repetitive objections to testimony)
- State v. Buckman, 237 Neb. 936, 468 N.W.2d 589 (1991) (jury unanimity required only as to guilt of first-degree murder, not theory)
- State v. Dixon, 286 Neb. 334, 837 N.W.2d 496 (2013) (factors relevant to eyewitness identification reliability)
