midpage
2014 Ohio 1363
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Robert J. Pifer was convicted after a bench trial of two counts of felonious assault under R.C. 2903.11(A)(1)-(2) following a confrontation outside a friend's home.
  • During the incident, Mr. Melton allegedly attacked Pifer with a two-by-four; Pifer testified he retreated to his van as others approached, then struck Melton with the van.
  • Melton suffered life-threatening injuries; treatment included emergency surgery and air evacuation.
  • The trial court merged the counts as allied offenses and sentenced on count one to five years in prison, three years post-release control, and restitution of $17,292.03 to Melton.
  • On appeal, Pifer argues ineffective assistance of counsel for not pursuing self-defense and for not requesting consideration of aggravated assault as a lesser-included offense, and that the verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Ineffective assistance for self-defense failure Pifer asserts trial counsel failed to request a self-defense instruction. Pifer contends counsel should have sought the lesser offense of aggravated assault. No ineffective assistance; no self-defense instruction warranted
Weight of the evidence Conviction supported by weight of the evidence against self-defense or lesser offense. Verdict should reflect entitlement to aggravated assault or self-defense under the evidence. Conviction not against the manifest weight; weight supports felony assault verdict

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Kovacic, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2010-L-065, 2012-Ohio-219 (Ohio 2012) (self-defense instruction requires evidence on three elements)
  • State v. Barnes, 94 Ohio St.3d 21, 2002-Ohio-68 (Ohio 2002) (test for self-defense instructions and necessity of retreat)
  • State v. Deem, 40 Ohio St.3d 205, 1988-Ohio-404 (Ohio 1988) (aggravated vs felonious assault; provocation element distinction)
  • State v. Mabry, 5 Ohio App.3d 13, 1982 (Ohio Ct. App. 1982) (provocation sufficient to incite deadly force in certain circumstances)
  • State v. DeHass, 10 Ohio St.2d 230, 1967 (Ohio 1967) (standard for appellate weight and credibility review)
  • State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380, 1997 (Ohio 1997) (weight-of-evidence standard; defer to trier of fact)
  • State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 1989 (Ohio 1989) (ineffective assistance test; Strickland standard for prejudice)
  • State v. Gau, 11th Dist. Ashtabula No. 2005-A-0082, 2006-Ohio-6531 (Ohio 2006) (defer to trial strategy; broad latitude in trial tactics)
  • State v. Phillips, 74 Ohio St.3d 72, 1995 (Ohio 1995) (tactics and strategy; not every strategic decision requires reversal)
  • State v. Mabry, 5 Ohio App.3d 13, 1982 (Ohio App. 1982) (see above; provocation and deadly force framework)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Pifer
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 31, 2014
Citations: 2014 Ohio 1363; 2013-P-0032
Docket Number: 2013-P-0032
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In