State v. Phillips
288 P.3d 310
Utah Ct. App.2012Background
- Two children, Brother (12) and Sister (11), lived with Defendant in a mobile home with their Mother and two younger siblings.
- In December 2008, after a party, Defendant returned home intoxicated and violently assaulted Brother, repeatedly slamming him and injuring him; he also threatened and restrained Brother while demanding Mother’s location.
- During the assault, Sister attempted to call Mother; Defendant directed Sister to undress, sexually assaulted and attempted to rape Sister, and threatened violence.
- Police later found physical injuries to Brother, and evidence including Sister’s clothing and weapons in Defendant’s room; photographic and medical testimony corroborated Brother’s injuries.
- Defendant was charged with aggravated sexual abuse of a child, attempted rape of a child, and inflicting serious physical injury on a child; defense conceding guilt on the lesser charge and trial strategy are central to the appeal; convictions and sentence were affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ineffective assistance: failure to enter formal guilty plea to child abuse charge | Phillips contends defense conceded but did not plead guilty | Counsel acted deficiently by not entering a plea | No deficient performance; strategic rationale supported by record |
| Ineffective assistance: failure to file motion to arrest judgment (Robbins-based) | Sister’s inconsistencies show inherent improbability; arrest judgment warranted | There was circumstantial evidence supporting Sister; arrest judgment futile | Inconsistent testimony did not meet Robbins standard; sufficient circumstantial evidence existed |
| Ineffective assistance: failure to object to sentencing comments | Prosecutor’s remarks influenced sentencing | Judge would have imposed different sentence absent remarks | No reversible error; remarks unlikely to have altered outcome; court disregarded them |
| Ineffective assistance: failure to clarify number of victims at sentencing | Court indicated three victims; counsel should have objected | Context shows two direct victims and possibly others; no likelihood of different result | No reversible error; no reasonable probability of different sentence |
Key Cases Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (standard for ineffective assistance of counsel; performance and prejudice)
- State v. Marble, 157 P.3d 371 (Utah Ct. App. 2007) (highly deferential review; possible strategic reasons for actions)
- State v. Robbins, 210 P.3d 288 (Utah 2009) (inherent improbability doctrine; when arrest judgment warranted)
- State v. Johnson, 784 P.2d 1135 (Utah 1989) (admissibility of related conduct as part of single criminal episode)
- State v. Kelley, 1 P.3d 546 (Utah 2000) (failure to raise futile objections not ineffective assistance)
- State v. Burke, 2011 UT App 168 (Utah App. 2011) (evidence of related offenses considered with surrounding facts)
- State v. Bates, 784 P.2d 1126 (Utah 1989) (404(b) evidence applicability to describe state of mind)
- State v. Marks, 262 P.3d 13 (Utah 2011) (child testimony may be inconsistent in sex abuse cases)
- State v. Virgin, 2006 UT 29, 137 P.3d 787 (Utah 2006) (credibility of child witnesses in abuse cases)
- Illinois v. Myatt, 384 N.E.2d 85 (Ill. 1979) (presumption that trial court disregards improper remarks)
