State v. Phillips
2016 Ohio 7049
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2016Background
- On July 20, 2015, Cuyahoga County Gang Impact Unit officers patrolling a high gang/drug area observed a group loitering on a one-way street at about 10:00 p.m.; officers circled and returned to investigate.
- When officers returned, Phillips moved to the front passenger side of a parked car, made a furtive motion along his waistband and placed an object under the vehicle, then fled.
- Sergeant Baeppler recovered a loaded 9mm semiautomatic handgun under the car; detectives later found rocks of suspected crack cocaine on Phillips when apprehended.
- No DNA testing was performed on the gun; Phillips told officers the gun belonged to a juvenile but admitted possessing cocaine.
- Phillips was indicted on multiple counts; jury convicted him of having a weapon while under disability, possession of cocaine with a one-year firearm specification, and obstructing official business; sentenced to two years.
- On appeal Phillips asserted ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to move to suppress, arguing the stop/seizure was not supported by reasonable, articulable suspicion.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether officers had reasonable, articulable suspicion to stop/detain Phillips | Officers argue their observations (high-crime area, night, furtive waistband gesture, placing object under car, immediate flight, officers' experience) provided reasonable suspicion to investigate | Phillips argues he and others were merely loitering and some had returned to sidewalk; the officers lacked specific suspicion to justify a Terry stop, so evidence (drugs) should have been suppressed | Court held the totality of circumstances (Bobo factors) supplied reasonable suspicion; stop was lawful, so counsel was not ineffective for not moving to suppress |
Key Cases Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (two-part ineffective-assistance test: deficient performance and prejudice)
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (officers may make brief investigatory stop on reasonable suspicion)
- Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) (warrantless searches/seizures presumptively unreasonable)
- State v. Bobo, 37 Ohio St.3d 177 (1988) (totality-of-circumstances test and articulable facts supporting suspicion an individual is armed)
- State v. Fincher, 76 Ohio App.3d 721 (1991) (approaching/retreating from vehicle not always sufficient for investigatory stop)
- State v. Walker, 90 Ohio App.3d 132 (1993) (flight alone in a drug area insufficient for stop)
