History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Pettway
2013 Ohio 1348
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Pettway was convicted in May 2008 of murder and firearm specifications, receiving 18-years to life imprisonment.
  • He appealed the conviction in 2009, and this court affirmed.
  • Pettway filed pro se post-conviction motions, including a November 14, 2011 motion to remand for waiver of court costs under State v. Joseph.
  • The trial court denied the remand motion on July 30, 2012.
  • Pettway argued Joseph required resentencing to waive costs, but the court held Joseph applies to direct appeals, not post-appeal motions, and that res judicata barred challengers after a direct appeal.
  • The appellate court affirmed, holding Pettway could have raised the court-cost issue on direct appeal and is barred from raising it through a post-appeal motion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Remand for waiver of court costs Pettway argues remand is needed to obtain a costs waiver per Joseph State argues Joseph does not authorize post-appeal correction and res judicata bars the issue Overruled; remand denied; issue barred by res judicata and direct-appeal route governs

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Joseph, 125 Ohio St.3d 76 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010) (costs must be imposed at sentencing; Crim.R. 43(A) issue not corrected post-appeal)
  • State v. Appleton, 8th Dist. No. 97942, 2012-Ohio-2778 (Ohio 8th Dist., 2012) (Joseph not controlling for post-appeal cost challenges)
  • State v. Walker, 8th Dist. No. 96305, 2011-Ohio-5270 (Ohio 8th Dist., 2011) (direct appeal route for costs; res judicata applies)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Pettway
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 4, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 1348
Docket Number: 98836
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.