History
  • No items yet
midpage
2017 Ohio 7732
Ohio Ct. App.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • David E. Penrod, Jr. was indicted on four counts including engaging in a pattern of corrupt activities, robbery, burglary, and receiving stolen property.
  • Penrod pleaded guilty to all counts on October 5, 2016 and was sentenced to a total of 13 years and 3 months imprisonment.
  • Appointed counsel appealed and filed an Anders brief; Penrod filed a pro se brief prompting appointment of new counsel to brief non-frivolous issues.
  • Penrod argued (1) ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to tell him the court was not bound by any sentencing recommendation, and (2) his plea was not knowing/intelligent for the same reason.
  • The record contained a handwritten “Pretrial Entry” noting the prosecutor “suggests a long prison term (8 years),” but four written plea forms signed by Penrod did not promise a specific sentence or a state recommendation.
  • The trial court rejected the claims, finding no contractual plea agreement or prosecutor promise and concluding Penrod’s plea was voluntary and counsel’s performance not deficient or prejudicial.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
1. Ineffective assistance of counsel Counsel performed reasonably and advised defendant adequately Penrod: counsel failed to inform him the court was not bound by any sentencing recommendation, depriving effective assistance Court: No deficient performance or prejudice—no plea agreement promising a sentence existed; claim overruled
2. Validity of guilty plea (knowing/intelligent) Plea was knowing; court and counsel accurately explained sentencing range Penrod: plea involuntary because he allegedly believed he'd get an 8-year sentence based on pretrial entry Court: No evidence of a binding recommendation or promise; plea was voluntary and intelligent; claim overruled

Key Cases Cited

  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (two-prong test for ineffective assistance of counsel)
  • Lockhart v. Fretwell, 506 U.S. 364 (1993) (prejudice inquiry in ineffective-assistance claims)
  • Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971) (prosecutor promises forming part of plea inducement must be fulfilled)
  • Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63 (1977) (breached plea agreements can render pleas involuntary)
  • State ex rel. Duran v. Kelsey, 106 Ohio St.3d 58 (2005) (trial courts not bound by jointly recommended sentences)
  • State v. Underwood, 124 Ohio St.3d 365 (2010) (same: court may reject plea agreement recommendations)
  • State v. Hooks, 92 Ohio St.3d 83 (2001) (appellate courts cannot add facts to the record on review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Penrod
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 19, 2017
Citations: 2017 Ohio 7732; 16-CA-83
Docket Number: 16-CA-83
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Penrod, 2017 Ohio 7732