384 P.3d 92
Mont.2016Background
- In 2013 Patterson and co-defendant Jesse King burglarized storage units and stole firearms and other items; some firearms were later recovered from pawn shops and Patterson’s sister.
- Patterson and King pled guilty to two counts of burglary; restitution was to be jointly and severally assessed.
- At plea/sentencing the parties initially agreed to $23,762 in restitution, but the presentence report added a $1,300 claim from Cash One Pawn and victim Ralph Tracy submitted an additional itemized $5,039.94 claim.
- Tracy testified he traveled from Nevada and spent 84 hours searching pawnshops across Montana, claiming lost wages ($2,520), mileage ($1,010), copying costs ($9.94), and $1,500 for damage to recovered firearms.
- The District Court accepted Tracy’s itemized claims and Cash One Pawn’s $1,300, ordering total restitution of $28,592 jointly and severally against Patterson and King.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the District Court erred in awarding Tracy’s claimed lost wages, mileage, copying costs, and property-damage as restitution | State: These items are pecuniary losses recoverable under § 46-18-243(1)(a)/(d) and conversion law (§ 27-1-320) because they were incurred in pursuing and recovering property | Patterson: Barrick and other authorities limit recoverable conversion damages; many such expenses are litigation-related or were already included in the earlier restitution figure and thus not properly added | Court affirmed: lost wages, mileage, copying costs, and damage to property were compensable as pecuniary loss under the statutes and supported by substantial evidence |
| Whether the $1,300 Cash One Pawn claim could be added after the parties’ earlier restitution discussion | State: The pawn claim was received after initial figure; because pleas were open, court could consider additional restitution | Patterson: Prior agreement/figure foreclosed later addition; improper to expand restitution at sentencing | Court affirmed: district court properly considered the late-submitted pawn claim and included it in restitution total |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Barrick, 378 Mont. 441, 347 P.3d 241 (Mont. 2015) (interpreting restitution and conversion limits on recovery of lost wages incurred in cooperating with prosecution)
- Gladstone v. Hillel, 250 Cal. Rptr. 372 (Cal. Ct. App. 1988) (expenses incurred in preparation for litigation are not recoverable as time/money spent in pursuit of converted property)
- Harwood State Bank v. Charon, 466 N.W.2d 601 (N.D. 1991) (attorney fees and litigation-related expenses are not recoverable under conversion’s "time and money properly expended in pursuit of the property")
