State v. Parsons
2025 Ohio 1324
Ohio Ct. App.2025Background
- Jeremy Keith Parsons was convicted of sexual battery against his 16-year-old stepdaughter, J.B., following a jury trial in Marion County, Ohio.
- The charges stemmed from an incident on July 28, 2023, where J.B. alleged that Parsons touched her inappropriately and digitally penetrated her after both had consumed alcohol.
- Witnesses at trial included J.B., a sexual assault nurse examiner, and law enforcement. J.B.'s account remained consistent about the core allegations, though some factual details were challenged.
- Parsons defended himself by providing an alternative version, asserting J.B. initiated any contact and challenging her credibility on the basis of inconsistency and prior family tensions.
- The jury convicted Parsons of sexual battery but acquitted him of rape. He was sentenced to 60 months in prison, a $10,000 fine, and five years of post-release control.
- On appeal, Parsons argued the conviction was against the manifest weight of the evidence and that the fine imposed was unconstitutional.
Issues
| Issue | Parsons's Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether conviction was against the manifest weight of the evidence | J.B.'s credibility was undermined by inconsistencies and possible motive to fabricate | Evidence was consistent, and jury is best positioned to weigh credibility | Conviction not against the manifest weight of the evidence |
| Constitutionality and lawfulness of $10,000 fine | Fine was imposed as a de facto no-contact order, amounting to cruel and unusual punishment and was unlawful | Fine was within statutory limits and aimed to punish/protect, not a no-contact order | Fine was lawful and not unconstitutional |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (1997) (appellate court acts as a thirteenth juror when reviewing manifest weight challenges)
- State v. Wilks, 2018-Ohio-1562 (Ohio 2018) (standard for reversing on manifest weight grounds)
- State v. Anderson, 2015-Ohio-2089 (Ohio 2015) (community control sanctions and prison are alternatives, not cumulative)
- McDougle v. Maxwell, 1 Ohio St.2d 68 (1964) (a sentence within statutory guidelines generally not cruel and unusual punishment)
