History
  • No items yet
midpage
106 So. 3d 378
Miss. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Mississippi forbids pretrial pleadings from testing the sufficiency of evidence to support an indictment.
  • Parkman, former Columbia police chief, was indicted on one embezzlement count and two false-statements counts.
  • Parkman moved to dismiss the embezzlement count, arguing the evidence was insufficient because he had paid for the gun.
  • The trial court dismissed the embezzlement count with prejudice, pretrial.
  • The State appealed to challenge the improper pretrial dismissal and seek reinstatement of the charge.
  • The issue on appeal was whether a pretrial dismissal testing evidentiary sufficiency could be reversed and the case remanded for trial.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
May a pretrial dismissal test evidentiary sufficiency? State argues pretrial dismissal cannot test sufficiency and should be reversed. Parkman contends pretrial challenges are improper; dismissal was justified. Pretrial dismissal to test sufficiency is improper; reversal and remand required.
What appellate avenue allows reversal of a pretrial dismissal? State relies on §99-35-103(a) for appeal and reversal/remand. Parkman would limit appeal if not permitted under the statute. Section 99-35-103(a) provides the proper avenue for reversal/remand.
Does §99-35-103(b) apply to pretrial dismissals and raise double jeopardy concerns? State could rely on §99-35-103(b) only if there had been an actual acquittal at trial. Parkman argues jeopardy concerns may bar such relief. §99-35-103(b) does not bar relief for a pretrial dismissal; jeopardy does not attach pre-trial.

Key Cases Cited

  • Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359 (1956) (indictment validity tested at trial, not pretrial)
  • United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 86 (1992) (pretrial review of facial indictments would undermine grand jury)
  • State v. Peoples, 481 So.2d 1069 (Miss.1986) (no summary judgment in criminal cases; challenge timing)
  • Grady, 281 So.2d 678 (Miss.1973) (no pretrial dismissal testing evidentiary sufficiency)
  • State v. Delaney, 52 So.3d 348 (Miss.2011) (reinstated indictment after improper pretrial dismissal)
  • Serfass v. United States, 420 U.S. 377 (1975) (jeopardy protections and timing of trial)
  • McDowell, 72 Miss. 138 (1894) (jeopardy perspective on §99-35-103(b) applicability)
  • United States v. Jorn, 400 U.S. 470 (1971) (jeopardy not attached before trial; pretrial review permissible)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Parkman
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Sep 25, 2012
Citations: 106 So. 3d 378; 2012 WL 4355531; 2012 Miss. App. LEXIS 592; No. 2010-KA-02052-COA
Docket Number: No. 2010-KA-02052-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Parkman, 106 So. 3d 378