553 P.3d 402
Mont.2024Background
- Preston Csoo Rossbach was convicted by a Missoula County jury of two counts of deliberate homicide (felony murder), assault with a weapon, tampering with evidence, and two counts of intimidation related to an October 2018 shooting in a Missoula motel.
- The convictions stemmed from an incident where Rossbach, Whitworth, and Charlo intended to confront a dealer about "bad" drugs, resulting in the shooting deaths of two victims and injuries to a third.
- Evidence included testimony from accomplices and jailhouse informants, forensic experts, and surviving witnesses, linking Rossbach to the attempted robbery and violence.
- Rossbach moved for acquittal or new trial on several grounds, all denied by the District Court.
- On appeal, Rossbach challenged juror impartiality, limits on cross-examination of informants, sufficiency of evidence for felony murder, and an alleged Brady violation regarding untimely disclosure of an informant letter.
Issues
| Issue | Rossbach's Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Denial of challenge for cause of Prospective Juror C.S. | C.S. was biased toward State witnesses; forced to use peremptory | C.S.'s voir dire established impartiality | District court did not abuse discretion |
| Limits on cross-exam of jailhouse informants | Restrictions violated confrontation rights | Cross allowed wide latitude; limits proper | No abuse of discretion; rights protected |
| Sufficiency of evidence for felony murder | No overt act for robbery; no jury basis for accountability | Evidence showed planned robbery, overt acts, and accountability | Sufficient evidence supported conviction |
| Brady violation (late informant letter) | Letter was impeaching; late disclosure warranted new trial | Letter immaterial; no prejudice; not suppressed | No reasonable probability of different outcome |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Ghostbear, 399 Mont. 208 (Mont. 2020) (abuse of discretion standard for juror challenges)
- State v. Garding, 373 Mont. 16 (Mont. 2013) (trial courts have broad discretion to limit cross-examination)
- State v. Boyd, 407 Mont. 1 (Mont. 2021) (sufficiency of the evidence review)
- State v. Burkhart, 325 Mont. 27 (Mont. 2004) (purpose and application of the felony-murder rule)
- State v. Reinert, 391 Mont. 263 (Mont. 2018) (elements of a Brady violation)
