History
  • No items yet
midpage
463 P.3d 610
Or. Ct. App.
2020
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant was charged with six sexual-offense counts against his girlfriend’s minor daughter (Counts 1–6).
  • On Friday the jury reported verdicts on Counts 2, 3, and 4 but was deadlocked on Counts 1, 5, and 6; the court sealed all six verdict forms for continuation on Monday.
  • Before Monday an alternate juror was seated (one juror unavailable) and another juror was later released for a family death; defendant objected that the change required new deliberations and that he was denied the right to poll the original jury on Counts 2–4.
  • The trial court received the verdicts on Counts 2–4 without polling the jury; the reconstituted jury later returned verdicts on the remaining counts (not guilty on Count 1; guilty on Counts 5 and 6).
  • Defendant appealed, raising (1) admission of an audio recording under OEC 803(18a)(b) and (2) alleged violations of ORCP 59 F and G(1), (3), (4), and (5) related to receiving the verdicts; the state conceded a violation of ORCP 59 G(1).
  • The court affirmed in part, reversed Counts 2, 3, and 4 and remanded for resentencing, concluding the jury-polling procedure violated defendant’s rights.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Admissibility of audio recording under OEC 803(18a)(b) State argued it gave sufficient notice to admit recording. Notice was insufficient under OEC 803(18a)(b). Assignment rejected; court affirmed admission without discussion.
Receiving verdicts after juror changes; compliance with ORCP 59 G(1) (jury polling) State conceded the trial court violated ORCP 59 G(1). Installation of alternates and juror changes required new deliberations and defendant had an absolute right to have the jury polled on Counts 2–4. Court agreed the polling requirement was violated; convictions on Counts 2, 3, and 4 reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Brooks v. Gladden, 226 Or. 191 (1961) (recognizing defendant’s right to have the jury polled upon return of verdict)
  • State v. Lewis, 18 Or. App. 206 (1974) (reversing where anonymous/altered polling procedure deprived defendant of absolute right to poll jury)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Ovalle
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Apr 1, 2020
Citations: 463 P.3d 610; 303 Or. App. 356; A167970
Docket Number: A167970
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Ovalle, 463 P.3d 610