History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Noor
283 P.3d 543
Utah Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Noor appeals his convictions for burglary, forcible sexual abuse, and lewdness in Utah Court of Appeals.
  • Facts: On May 28, 2009, Noor entered J.E.'s apartment after a hallway confrontation about loud music and refused to leave.
  • Noor disrobed and made sexually explicit advances toward J.E.; she called the police as he continued.
  • Noor was arrested; at trial he was cross-examined about intoxication and limited English; defense presented no witnesses.
  • Noor moved for a directed verdict on insufficiency of the evidence; district court denied; jury convicted on all counts.
  • On appeal Noor challenges sufficiency of evidence for intent to commit lewdness/forcible sexual abuse and for unlawful entry with such intent; issue preservation is raised.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Preservation of sufficiency challenge Noor contends insufficient evidence for intent to commit lewdness/forcible sexual abuse. State did not provide a preservation for this sufficiency challenge; district court did not address those arguments. Not preserved; convictions affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Hirschi, 167 P.3d 503 (Utah 2007) (standard for reviewing sufficiency of the evidence)
  • Santonio v. State, 265 P.3d 822 (Utah 2011) (preservation requirements for appellate review)
  • 438 Main St. v. Easy Heat, Inc., 99 P.3d 801 (Utah 2004) (preservation requirement—mere mention not preserved for appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Noor
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Utah
Date Published: Jul 12, 2012
Citation: 283 P.3d 543
Docket Number: 20110198-CA
Court Abbreviation: Utah Ct. App.