History
  • No items yet
midpage
372 N.C. 609
N.C.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Billy Dean Morgan pled no contest to two counts of assault with a deadly weapon and received consecutive suspended sentences with 36 months supervised probation.
  • Probation officer filed written violation reports before the probation term expired alleging failures to report, unpaid fees, absconding, and a new conviction; a felony probation-violation warrant issued while probation was active.
  • Morgan’s probation term expired on 28 August 2016; a revocation hearing was held 12 days later on 9 September 2016, where counsel admitted multiple violations and the court announced it would revoke probation and activate the sentences.
  • The written judgments revoking probation did not include an explicit finding that "good cause shown and stated" existed to revoke probation after the expiration of the probationary term.
  • The Court of Appeals (majority) affirmed based on prior authority that a specific "good cause" finding may be inferred from the record; a dissent argued a statutory finding was required.
  • The North Carolina Supreme Court granted review to decide whether N.C.G.S. § 15A-1344(f)(3) requires an express trial-court finding of "good cause shown and stated" to revoke probation after the probationary period has ended.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a trial court must make an explicit finding of "good cause shown and stated" under N.C.G.S. § 15A-1344(f)(3) before revoking probation after the probationary period expires The State: no explicit finding required; good cause may be inferred from the hearing transcript and judgments Morgan: statute requires the court to make an express factual finding that good cause exists and is stated on the record The Court: statute’s plain language and precedent require an explicit court finding of good cause; revocation without that finding was error; remand for the required finding

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Bryant, 361 N.C. 100, 637 S.E.2d 532 (2006) (trial court must make the specific statutory finding—evidence alone is insufficient)
  • State v. Coltrane, 307 N.C. 511, 299 S.E.2d 199 (1983) (court must make express findings when statute conditions a right on a judicial finding)
  • State v. Camp, 299 N.C. 524, 263 S.E.2d 592 (1980) (trial court may only revoke probation after its term expires as permitted by statute)
  • State v. Regan, 253 N.C. App. 351, 800 S.E.2d 436 (2017) (Court of Appeals held good-cause finding may be inferred from record; partially overruled by this opinion)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Morgan
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Aug 16, 2019
Citations: 372 N.C. 609; 831 S.E.2d 254; 150A18
Docket Number: 150A18
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In
    State v. Morgan, 372 N.C. 609