History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Morgan
2014 Ohio 654
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Morgan was charged in 2013 with unauthorized removal of scrap under Youngstown City Ordinance 545.23, an unclassified misdemeanor.
  • He initially pled not guilty; counsel was appointed and later he changed to a no contest plea under a plea agreement.
  • Sentencing followed: 150 days in jail, a $500 fine, and 18 months of probation.
  • Appellant challenges the plea on the basis that Crim.R. 11(D) requirements were not personally addressed nor explained to him, affecting voluntariness.
  • The record shows no personal address or dialogue with Morgan before accepting the plea, and the plea form allegedly mis-stated potential penalties.
  • The appellate court reversed, vacated the plea and conviction, and remanded for proceedings consistent with its opinion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Crim.R. 11(D) was satisfied Morgan argues there was no personal address or explanation of effects. Morgan contends his understanding of penalties was misrepresented on the plea form. Crim.R. 11(D) not satisfied; plea vacated and case remanded

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Williams, 7th Dist. No. 01 CA 221, 2002-Ohio-5022 (2002) (unclassified misdemeanor; Crim.R. 11 applicable)
  • State v. Bailes, 7th Dist. No. 01-CA-224, 2002-Ohio-5217 (2002) (totality of circumstances; meaningful dialogue required)
  • State v. Clark, 11th Dist. No. 2011-Ohio-090, 2012-Ohio-3889 (2012) (meaningful dialogue in misdemeanor pleas)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Morgan
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 21, 2014
Citation: 2014 Ohio 654
Docket Number: 13-MA-80
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.