History
  • No items yet
midpage
2015 Ohio 4182
Ohio Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Christopher Moore was indicted on six counts including two counts of rape (victim under 13), kidnapping, domestic violence, and intimidation; several counts carried sexually violent predator specifications.
  • Moore pleaded guilty to an amended first-degree felony rape count and an amended third-degree felony gross sexual imposition count; remaining counts were dismissed.
  • The trial court obtained a presentence investigation, merged counts for sentencing, and sentenced Moore to ten years on the amended rape count.
  • At the plea colloquy the trial court mistakenly advised the rape penalty as "three to eleven months," and the prosecutor immediately corrected the court.
  • The court corrected the error to "three to eleven years," asked Moore if the correction changed his decision to plead, and Moore answered "no."
  • Moore appealed, arguing the trial court failed to properly advise him of the maximum penalty under Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court failed to advise defendant of the maximum penalty under Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) State: The court substantially complied with Crim.R. 11; correction was immediate and defendant indicated understanding Moore: Misstatement of penalty (months vs. years) violated Crim.R. 11 and requires vacatur The court held there was substantial compliance; plea was knowing, voluntary, intelligent and not prejudiced by the error

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Veney, 120 Ohio St.3d 176, 897 N.E.2d 621 (Ohio 2008) (strict compliance required for constitutional advisements; prejudice required for nonconstitutional errors)
  • State v. Nero, 56 Ohio St.3d 106, 564 N.E.2d 474 (Ohio 1990) (nonconstitutional Crim.R. 11 advisements require substantial compliance; defines test)
  • State v. Caplinger, 105 Ohio App.3d 567, 664 N.E.2d 959 (Ohio Ct. App.) (substantial compliance shown if defendant appreciated plea effects despite error)
  • State v. Drake, 73 Ohio App.3d 640, 598 N.E.2d 115 (Ohio Ct. App.) (change of heart is insufficient to withdraw a knowing, voluntary plea)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Moore
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 8, 2015
Citations: 2015 Ohio 4182; 102400
Docket Number: 102400
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Moore, 2015 Ohio 4182