History
  • No items yet
midpage
806 N.W.2d 874
Minn. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Moody pleaded guilty to felony fifth-degree controlled-substance possession under Minn.Stat. § 152.18 with a stay of adjudication and a five-year probation term.
  • The State agreed to cap its request for jail time at 45 days as part of the plea agreement.
  • The district court stayed adjudication and imposed probation with a jail-time condition of 45 days in Mille Lacs County Jail.
  • Incident occurred after-hours in a city park; officer found drug paraphernalia, marijuana, and cocaine in Moody’s vehicle, plus alcohol in the trunk.
  • Moody consented to the stay and the 45-day jail term; Moody appealed the jail-time condition after the stay was imposed.
  • The issue on appeal was whether the district court could impose jail time as a condition of a stay of adjudication under Section 152.18.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Appealability of a felony stay of adjudication Moody contends stays of adjudication are not appealable as of right once consented to. State contends stays are appeals from sentences and thus appealable. Stays of adjudication in felony cases are appealable as of right.
Authority to impose jail time as a condition of a stay under § 152.18 Moody argues jail time cannot be a condition of a stay since no conviction is entered. State argues the court may impose reasonable conditions, including jail, with consent under § 152.18. District court may impose jail time as a reasonable condition of a stay of adjudication.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Allinder, 746 N.W.2d 923 (Minn.App.2008) (stay of adjudication for a felony is a sentence appealable under Rule 28.02)
  • State v. Ender, 467 N.W.2d 39 (Minn.App.1991) (stay of adjudication designed to give second chance; incarceration may be a condition)
  • State v. Sutherlin, 341 N.W.2d 303 (Minn.App.1983) (probationary jail time is within district court discretion)
  • State v. McCalister, 462 N.W.2d 407 (Minn.App.1990) (no strict guidelines for probation conditions; discretion to impose)
  • State v. Friberg, 435 N.W.2d 509 (Minn.App.1989) (conditions of probation must be reasonably related to sentencing goals)
  • State v. Lee, 706 N.W.2d 491 (Minn.2005) (concern about imposing jail time at pretrial stage; supports authority to impose jail as a condition)
  • State v. Angotti, 683 N.W.2d 554 (Minn.App.2001) (stay of adjudication allows imposing terms including incarceration up to 12 months)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Moody
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Date Published: Dec 12, 2011
Citations: 806 N.W.2d 874; 2011 WL 6141653; 2011 Minn. App. LEXIS 148; No. A11-773
Docket Number: No. A11-773
Court Abbreviation: Minn. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Moody, 806 N.W.2d 874