State v. Molina
299 Kan. 651
| Kan. | 2014Background
- Molina was convicted by a jury of two counts of first-degree premeditated murder and one count of criminal possession of a firearm; Lopez was codefendant.
- District court sentenced Molina to life without parole for 50 years on the first murder, life without parole for 25 years on the second murder, and 8 months for the firearm; sentences were consecutive for the murders and concurrent for the firearm.
- Molina appealed, challenging (i) unrequested limiting instructions for other crimes evidence and (ii) an unrequested instruction on voluntary manslaughter as a lesser included offense.
- He also challenged sentencing, including the constitutionality of the hard 50 under Alleyne, double jeopardy based on the same aggravator, and lifetime postrelease supervision for off-grid convictions.
- The Court vacated the hard 50 sentence due to Sixth Amendment error, remanded for resentencing, and vacated the unauthorized lifetime postrelease supervision portion; remaining sentences were affirmed subject to remand.
- On remand, the district court is directed to address resentencing consistent with the opinion and applicable amended statutes.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether failure to give unrequested limiting instructions was clear error | Molina | Molina | No clear error; no reversible impact on verdict |
| Whether failure to give voluntary manslaughter as a lesser included offense was error | Molina | Molina | No error; insufficient heat-of-passion provocation evidence to warrant instruction |
| Whether the hard 50 sentencing scheme violated Alleyne and the Sixth Amendment | Molina | State | Unconstitutional; hard 50 vacated and remanded for resentencing |
| Whether double jeopardy concerns arise from using the same aggravating factor for hard 50 and consecutive life terms | Molina | State | No error; precedent allows same aggravator for concurrent and consecutive terms |
| Whether lifetime postrelease supervision was improperly imposed for off-grid convictions | Molina | State | Invalid; lifetime postrelease supervision vacated on remand |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Soto, 299 Kan. 102 (2014) (hard 50/Alleyne issues; Sixth Amendment concerns)
- State v. Breeden, 297 Kan. 567 (2013) (necessity of limiting instructions for 60-455 evidence)
- State v. Goodson, 281 Kan. 913 (2006) (distinction between gang membership evidence and gang crime evidence)
- State v. Williams, 295 Kan. 506 (2012) (standard for reviewing failure to give unrequested jury instructions)
- State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564 (2000) (double jeopardy considerations in sentencing)
- State v. Summers, 293 Kan. 819 (2012) (postrelease supervision authority limits)
- State v. Cash, 293 Kan. 326 (2011) (parole and postrelease supervision for off-grid offenses)
- State v. Foster, 290 Kan. 696 (2010) (voluntary manslaughter as a lesser included offense framework)
- State v. Gallegos, 286 Kan. 869 (2008) (elements of voluntary manslaughter)
