State v. Merriweather
84 N.E.3d 72
Ohio Ct. App.2017Background
- In March 2015 at Wise Guys Bar in Fairfield, Ohio, a fight between two groups led to gunfire; Vincent Brown was shot in the face and chest and died; Rodquisha Black (defendant's sister) was shot in the arm and survived.
- Demarko J. Merriweather was identified at trial as the shooter based on distinctive clothing (a white Michael Kors shirt and a white tank top), surveillance video, witness identifications, and gunshot-residue (GSR) tests on his hands and some clothing.
- Merriweather testified he did not shoot Brown; he admitted firing a gun into the air after his sister was shot and admitted lying to police during the initial interview.
- A jury convicted Merriweather of murder, felonious assault (for shooting at another person), and accompanying firearm specifications; the court imposed consecutive sentences totaling 25 years (including a 4-year felonious-assault term labeled "mandatory").
- On appeal Merriweather challenged sufficiency/manifest weight of evidence, admission of two photos from his phone, alleged prosecutorial misconduct, and the trial court’s labeling of the felonious-assault term as mandatory.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency / manifest weight of evidence for murder and felonious assault | State: identification by multiple witnesses, surveillance video, and GSR support convictions | Merriweather: evidence inconsistent; he denied shooting Brown and said he only fired in the air | Court: Evidence sufficient; jury did not lose its way; assignments overruled |
| Admission of two phone photographs | State: photos link Merriweather to the phone, show associations with others at scene (including Rafael Knight) and are probative | Merriweather: photos taken on other occasions are irrelevant and unduly prejudicial | Court: No abuse of discretion; probative value outweighed any prejudice; admission proper |
| Prosecutorial misconduct (opening, closing, burden-shift, credibility comments) | State: comments were fair comment on evidence and defendant’s changing story; did not shift burden | Merriweather: prosecutor improperly referenced grand jury, vouched, called him a liar, and shifted burden | Court: Remarks improper in part (grand jury), but not plain error; context made comments evidentiary; no unfair trial; assignment overruled |
| Sentencing labeling of felonious-assault term as “mandatory” | State: N/A (state conceded clerical error) | Merriweather: four-year felonious-assault term was erroneously labeled mandatory though statutory mandatory factors did not apply | Court: Sustained; trial court to issue nunc pro tunc entry removing “mandatory” from sentence |
Key Cases Cited
- Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259 (Ohio 1991) (standard for reviewing sufficiency of the evidence)
- Collins, 89 Ohio St.3d 524 (Ohio 2000) (state may comment on defendant’s failure to produce evidence)
- Elmore, 111 Ohio St.3d 515 (Ohio 2006) (standard for reversing on prosecutorial misconduct requires showing prejudice to substantial rights)
