History
  • No items yet
midpage
351 P.3d 797
Or. Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant arrested for DUII after being stopped for speeding on Crystal Springs Road.
  • Defendant refused a breath test, leading to a DMV suspension hearing.
  • An ALJ issued a Final Order Dismissing Suspension containing findings about the stop and credibility of Officer Ginnow.
  • Defendant sought to admit the DMV order at suppression, arguing it was relevant to credibility and impeachment, while the trial court refused.
  • OEC 104 and 101 permit the suppression court to consider preliminary questions about admissibility without applying typical evidence rules.
  • The appellate court held the DMV order should have been admitted but the error was harmless, affirming the conviction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Admissibility of DMV order at suppression hearing Defendant Defendant Harmless error; order should have been admitted but not outcome-determinative

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Wright, 315 Or 124 (1992) (preliminary questions and evidentiary rules not binding in suppression hearings)
  • State v. Davis, 336 Or 19 (2003) (harmless-error standard for exclusion of evidence at trial)
  • State v. Klein, 243 Or App 1 (2011) (exclusion not reversible if not qualitatively different from admitted evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. McRae
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Jun 2, 2015
Citations: 351 P.3d 797; 271 Or. App. 558; 121154082; A153992
Docket Number: 121154082; A153992
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. McRae, 351 P.3d 797