State v. McLean
712 S.E.2d 271
N.C. Ct. App.2011Background
- Six-count indictment (July 7, 2008) charged McLean with two counts of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury, three counts of discharging a firearm into a conveyance in motion, and one count of first degree murder; two discharges were dismissed before trial; trial began January 19, 2010.
- Police responded to multiple calls; at McLean's residence they learned of family conflict and heard gunshots; Antron Hines was shot and died from shotgun wounds.
- Jaquan Hines testified that a store fight led to Defendant being handed a shotgun and shooting; Jaquan and Shawntana Thompson were shot; pellets remained in Jaquan for months.
- Samuel McClary, a bus driver, observed Defendant with a shotgun during a red-light incident; seven or eight pellets struck the bus windshield area.
- January 22, 2010, the jury found McLean guilty of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury as to Jaquan Hines, guilty of the lesser offense as to Shawntana Thompson, and guilty of discharging a firearm into a moving vehicle; murder charge resulted in mistrial; sentences imposed in ranges for each conviction.
- McLean timely appealed challenging sufficiency of evidence and trial court instructions and a sentencing issue regarding probation-related points.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of the evidence for serious injury | McLean lacked evidence of serious injury to Jaquan. | No substantial evidence of serious injury; Jaquan testified no pain, and other factors were lacking. | There was substantial evidence of serious injury; jury could determine seriousness from physical injury and related facts. |
| Instruction on discharging into a moving vehicle | Pattern and substantive instructions properly stated willful/wanton and intentional elements. | Trial court erred by equating willful/wanton with intentional and omitting/altering language. | Instructions followed pattern and law; no error; no due process violation. |
| Sentencing based on probation status | Correct prior record level; probation status supported sentence. | Possible improper scoring; should be reviewable as right to appeal. | Defendant not entitled to direct appeal on this issue; record supported prior level; petition for certiorari available but issue not properly before. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Reid, 335 N.C. 647 (1994) (defines elements of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury)
- State v. Ramseur, 338 N.C. 502 (1994) (serious injury standard in assault cases; factors like pain, hospitalization, etc.)
- State v. Morgan, 164 N.C.App. 298 (2004) (serious injury question is jury-governed; case-by-case evaluation)
- State v. Joyner, 295 N.C. 55 (1978) (evidence of bodily injury suffices for jury to decide seriousness)
- State v. Alexander, 337 N.C. 182 (1994) (victim injury evidence supports jury determination of serious injury)
