History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. McGee
2016 Ohio 7510
Ohio Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • On Nov. 22, 2013, Marshall Frazier called 911 saying Mark McGee had threatened to kill him; minutes later a shooting occurred at Frazier’s apartment and Frazier died of a chest gunshot.
  • Neighbors observed a man shoot another as the door opened; Frazier was found on the landing holding a kitchen knife; the bullet trajectory was downward consistent with a doorway shooting.
  • McGee was treated at a hospital for a stab wound; he told police and the grand jury that Frazier stabbed him first while McGee was attempting to flee and that he had rented a gun he thought was unloaded.
  • Indictment charged murder, felonious assault, firearm specs, concealed-weapon offenses, and tampering with evidence (state could not locate the gun); bench trial followed.
  • Trial court convicted McGee of voluntary manslaughter (reduced from murder), carrying a concealed weapon, and tampering with evidence; sentenced to 18.5 years. McGee appealed.

Issues

Issue State's Argument McGee's Argument Held
Admission of 911 and related hearsay; Confrontation Clause 911 statements were admissible as excited utterances and nontestimonial (primary purpose was to get emergency help) 911 statements were hearsay/testimonial and violated Crawford confrontation rights; mother’s out-of-court statement was inadmissible hearsay Court: 911 call admissible as excited utterance and nontestimonial; no Confrontation Clause violation; mother’s statement harmless in bench trial (no plain error)
Ineffective assistance for failing to object to hearsay Counsel’s omissions were reasonable; statements were admissible or cumulative; no prejudice Counsel ineffective for not objecting to hearsay Court: Counsel performance not deficient and no prejudice under Strickland; claim denied
Sufficiency / manifest weight: carrying a concealed weapon and tampering with evidence Evidence showed gun was concealed (back pocket under coat) and post-shooting inconsistent statements plus missing gun supported tampering intent Insufficient evidence that gun was concealed or that McGee intended to impair evidence Court: Evidence sufficient; convictions for concealed weapon and tampering stand (not against manifest weight)
Sentencing errors: consecutive findings, consideration of R.C. factors, DNA notification, clerical murder label Court made required consecutive findings at hearing and entry, considered sentencing principles, DNA-notification omission is harmless, and murder label was clerical Trial court failed statutory findings, failed to consider factors, failed to notify about DNA, and entry wrongly lists murder not manslaughter Court: Sentencing affirmed (findings present); DNA notice error harmless; clerical error corrected via nunc pro tunc entry (remand for correction)

Key Cases Cited

  • Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (announcing testimonial hearsay rule under the Confrontation Clause)
  • Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (911 statements nontestimonial when primary purpose is obtaining emergency assistance)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (standard for ineffective assistance of counsel)
  • State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259 (sufficiency-of-the-evidence standard in Ohio)
  • State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (manifest-weight review in Ohio)
  • State v. Siler, 116 Ohio St.3d 39 (treatment of 911 statements under Confrontation Clause)
  • State v. Bonnell, 140 Ohio St.3d 209 (consecutive-sentence findings post-Bonnell)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. McGee
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 28, 2016
Citation: 2016 Ohio 7510
Docket Number: C-150496
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.