State v. Martinez-Gonzalez
152 Idaho 775
| Idaho Ct. App. | 2012Background
- Martinez-Gonzalez was arrested in a privately-owned apartment complex parking lot after officers observed open beer, a smell of alcohol, glazed eyes, and slurred speech; he admitted drinking and then drove toward his apartment.
- Officers stopped Martinez-Gonzalez, conducted field sobriety tests, and arrested him on suspicion of DUI when he refused to participate.
- A jail search revealed methamphetamine in his coat pocket, and a breath test showed a BAC of .01, below the legal limit.
- The State charged one felony count of possession of a controlled substance after the DUI arrest, and did not charge DUI.
- Martinez-Gonzalez moved to suppress the evidence or dismiss the information, arguing the stop/arrest lacked probable cause and failed on Fourth Amendment grounds.
- The district court rejected the suppression/dismissal motions, holding there was probable cause and that the parking lot was private property open to the public.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probable cause for warrantless DUI arrest | State: officers had probable cause based on open cans, odor, slurred speech, admission, and driving behavior | Martinez-Gonzalez: no probable cause to arrest for DUI | Probable cause established; arrest lawful |
| Parking lot as private property open to the public | State: apartment complex parking lot is open to the public for vehicular traffic | Martinez-Gonzalez: parking is private property not open to the public | Parking lot deemed open to the public; DUI statute applies |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Willoughby, 147 Idaho 482 (Idaho Ct. App. 2009) (standard of review for suppression motions; credibility and factual findings retained by trial court)
- State v. Fees, 140 Idaho 81 (Idaho 2004) (probable cause and suppression standards; abuse-of-discretion review in related contexts)
- State v. Armbruster, 117 Idaho 19 (Ct. App. 1989) (probable cause de novo review; corroborating factors for DUI cases)
- State v. Julian, 129 Idaho 133 (Idaho 1996) (probable cause standard; guidance on driving under the influence considerations)
- Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160 (U.S. 1949) (probable cause concept; reasonable-person standard)
- State v. Gibson, 126 Idaho 256 (Idaho 1994) (open-to-public property analysis for DUI statute; lived experience of access and intent)
- State v. Knott, 132 Idaho 476 (Idaho 1999) (definitive boundary for private property open to the public under DUI statute; abrogated in part by later developments but precedent on interpretation remains)
- State v. Schmitt, 144 Idaho 768 (Ct. App. 2007) (open parking lots and public access analysis for open-container/lot-access issues)
- State v. Reyes, 139 Idaho 502 (Ct. App. 2003) (free review of ambiguous statutory language in DUI context; case-law-based framework)
- State v. Rhode, 133 Idaho 459 (Idaho 1999) (interpretation of statute in context of open-to-public concept)
