History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Marsha P.
11 A.3d 1164
Conn. App. Ct.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Marsha P. was convicted by jury of risk of injury to a child (M) under § 53-21(a)(1) after a July 4, 2007 crash where M and J (ages 6 and 9) died; H survived.
  • Defendant drove with three children; she accelerated, failed to merge, crossed double yellow lines, and struck an oncoming vehicle.
  • State charged two counts of manslaughter with a DUI and three counts of risk of injury to a child and three counts of assault with a DUI; she was acquitted on most counts.
  • Jury found guilty only of risk of injury to M; sentenced to five years with execution suspended, five years probation, and $5,000 fine.
  • Court addressed whether § 14-100a (child safety restraint) was a lesser included offense of risk of injury, and whether Whistnant, etc., required such an instruction.
  • Court concluded defendant was not entitled to a Whistnant-based lesser included offense instruction for § 14-100a, and affirmed the conviction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the court erred by omitting a lesser included offense instruction Marsha P. contends § 14-100a is a lesser included offense. Defendant argues the infraction is a lesser included offense and should have been charged. No reversible error; Whistnant not satisfied; instruction not required.
Whether denial of posttrial motion for a new trial was plain error Defendant argues error in not granting a new trial for lack of a proper jury instruction. State argues no Whistnant entitlement and no plain error. Plain error not established; Whistnant unmet.
Whether the evidence supports the judgment of acquittal on insufficiency grounds Evidence supports guilt beyond reasonable doubt for risk of injury to M. Evidence insufficient to prove elements beyond reasonable doubt. Sufficient evidence; conviction upheld.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Whistnant, 179 Conn. 583 (1980) (four-part test for lesser included offense instruction)
  • State v. Corbin, 260 Conn. 730 (2002) (standard for evaluating requested lesser included offense instructions)
  • State v. Arena, 235 Conn. 67 (1995) (unsettled frontier of lesser included offenses; citation sufficiency)
  • State v. Rudd, 62 Conn. App. 702 (2001) (practice-points on requests to charge)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Marsha P.
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Feb 15, 2011
Citation: 11 A.3d 1164
Docket Number: AC 31137
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.