State v. Marcum
2013 Ohio 5333
Ohio Ct. App.2013Background
- Marcum convicted of complicity to burglary (3rd degree) after a jury trial.
- Indictment for burglary returned Sept. 24, 2010; events involved April 23–24, 2009 at Gerald Haffelt’s residence in Gallia County, Ohio.
- Marcum, a West Virginia resident, was linked to the thefts of vintage guitars through co-defendants and informants.
- Witnesses included Josh McCoy and Steven Marcum (co-defendants) and Teresa Lee (the Haffelts’ daughter); a monitored call implicated Marcum.
- Defense presented alibi and credibility witnesses showing Marcum was in West Virginia during the relevant time window; recording of the call was admitted but not electronically preserved in the record.
- Appellant challenges prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel; appellate court affirms trial court ruling, finding no reversible error.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prosecutorial misconduct during trial and closing | State argues conduct did not deprive fair trial; errors were not plain error. | Marcum asserts multiple improper statements biased the jury and violated due process. | No reversible prosecutorial misconduct; no plain error found. |
| Ineffective assistance of counsel | State contends counsel's handling of alleged misconduct was reasonable strategy. | Marcum claims ineffective assistance for not objecting and seeking curative instructions. | Counsel's performance not deficient; no prejudice demonstrated. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Purdin, 2013-Ohio-22 (4th Dist. 2013) (prosecutorial misconduct must prejudice the trial to be reversible; plain error require exceptional circumstances)
- State v. Leonard, 2009-Ohio-6191 (4th Dist. 2009) (focus on fairness of trial rather than prosecutor culpability)
- State v. Smith, 2002-Ohio-6659 (Ohio 2002) (standard for prosecutorial conduct in closing arguments)
- State v. Givens, 2008-Ohio-1202 (4th Dist. 2008) (adoptive admission doctrine; evidentiary impact in trial)
