State v. Malone
2013 Ohio 2605
Ohio Ct. App.2013Background
- Malone was indicted on aggravated burglary, gross sexual imposition, and assault in Lorain County (case 09CR078640).
- The State amended the indictment, dropping the gross sexual imposition charge; Malone pled guilty to aggravated burglary and assault on February 17, 2010.
- Malone also pled guilty in a related case (09CR079566) for robbery with a repeat violent offender specification.
- Sentencing occurred on June 11, 2010, with four years for aggravated burglary and four months for assault; sentences run concurrently but prior to the other case, to aid early release.
- Malone moved to withdraw his guilty plea pro se on December 27, 2011; the trial court denied without a hearing; Malone appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the motion to withdraw the guilty plea was properly denied | Malone asserts defense counsel ineffective and plea not knowingly made | State contends no manifest injustice; guilty plea valid | Denied; court found no manifest injustice and no deficient performance |
| Whether Malone received ineffective assistance of counsel | Malone claims counsel failed to inform him of weak evidence and to pursue pretrial issues | State argues no prejudice shown; record supports counsel's strategy | Overruled; no proven deficient performance or prejudice |
Key Cases Cited
- Bradley v. Levine, 42 Ohio St.3d 136 (1989) (Strickland standard applied to effectiveness of counsel in Ohio)
- Engle v. State, 74 Ohio St.3d 525 (1996) (waiver and knowing, intelligent plea requirements)
- Clark v. State, 119 Ohio St.3d 239 (2008) (Criminal Rule 11 colloquy; knowing and voluntary plea)
- Bradley, State v., 42 Ohio St.3d 136 (1989) (Strickland standard; reasonable basis for counsel's performance)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (establishes deficient performance and prejudice)
