History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. M.D.
2011 Ohio 1804
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant M.D. seeks expungement of four 1998 convictions under R.C. 2953.31–2953.32.
  • Tampering-with-evidence conviction vacated on appeal in 2004; other convictions remained.
  • July 2, 2008, application to seal records denied; remanded in 2009 to assess first-offender status.
  • Trial court in 2010 held appellant not a first offender under R.C. 2953.31(A) and denied sealing.
  • Appellant appeals; reviewing court must determine if appellant is a first offender for expungement purposes.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether MD is a first offender under R.C. 2953.31(A). State conceded first-offender status at oral hearing. MD argues first-offender status is a legal question for the court to determine. MD is a first offender; remand for 2953.32 analysis.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Simon, 87 Ohio St.3d 531 (2000) (defines expungement eligibility framework)
  • State v. Krantz, 2003-Ohio-4568 (2003) (trial court must apply 2953.32 criteria if a requirement is unmet)
  • State v. McGinnis, 90 Ohio App.3d 479 (1993) (first-offender status is a legal question reviewed de novo)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. M.D.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 14, 2011
Citation: 2011 Ohio 1804
Docket Number: 95383
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.